You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's great that we have the /extended/v2/mempool/fees endpoint to get a sense for what a reasonable transaction fee should be.
However, transaction sizes may vary. It would be great if we could have a similar endpoint, e.g. /extended/v2/mempool/fee-rates which returned average lom/mid/high fee rates for the different transaction types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Setting the transaction fee based on the size of a transaction
The assumption here is that a tx's size matters to miners when considering whether to include it in a block based on the fee. Does it matter though? Are transactions with larger fee rates selected first to be included in a block, or is the total fee amount the only number that matters?
It's great that we have the
/extended/v2/mempool/fees
endpoint to get a sense for what a reasonable transaction fee should be.However, transaction sizes may vary. It would be great if we could have a similar endpoint, e.g.
/extended/v2/mempool/fee-rates
which returned average lom/mid/high fee rates for the different transaction types.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: