Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Correct entity relationship for the rule entities #40

Open
ravilodhi opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Correct entity relationship for the rule entities #40

ravilodhi opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ravilodhi
Copy link
Contributor

Do following -

  1. Use moqui.basic.StatusItem instead of org.apache.ofbiz.common.status.StatusItem
  2. Use moqui.basic.Enumeration instead of org.apache.ofbiz.common.enum.Enumeration
ravilodhi added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
@ravilodhi
Fixed: Used Moqui entities instead of OFBiz as the rule entities are …
99bf195 
…independant of OFBiz (#40).
dixitdeepak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
@dixitdeepak
Merge pull request #41 from hotwax/#40
1a230c7 
Fixed: Used Moqui entities instead of OFBiz as the rule entities are independent of OFBiz (#40).
ravilodhi added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
@ravilodhi
Fixed: Corrected status data to use sequenceNum instead of sequenceId (…
19f1995 
…#40).
@ravilodhi ravilodhi mentioned this issue Dec 16, 2024
Merged
dixitdeepak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
@dixitdeepak
Merge pull request #42 from hotwax/#40
3569bb2 
Fixed: Corrected status data to use sequenceNum instead of sequenceId (#40).
ravilodhi added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
@ravilodhi
Fixed: Removed unused api endpoints (#40).
2370168
@ravilodhi ravilodhi mentioned this issue Dec 17, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ravilodhi