Added the compression-dictionary draft #2624
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the edits (hope it didn't generate too many emails as I merged the changes). |
There were a few. From the "Files" panel, you can batch the suggestions and apply them as a single commit. |
|
Another point: @mnot or @tfpauly probably need to give @pmeenan (and @yoavweiss) access to this repo. |
|
Invited @pmeenan . @yoavweiss already was on the list |
mnot
reviewed
Aug 31, 2023
mnot
reviewed
Aug 31, 2023
Co-authored-by: Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>
|
@pmeenan looks good to me FWIW - merge and release when you see fit. Note that you can release from github -- see: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the -00 draft of the compression-dictionary ID. I used the resumable-upload.md draft as a template for the metadata fields at the top of the document so hopefully they are correct for an IETF-standards track draft.