-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tickets added to the bottom of the list? #134
Comments
Hey @seanlinsley, do you mean when you are dragging a card to any blank space at the very of the bottom of the column ? |
Following up on this, @seanlinsley. Is this still an issue for you? I can't speak to whether this was an intentional change in behavior, but we do seem to consistently place cards at the bottom when dropped into the empty space below a column. That said, it would be nice to be able to send issues to the top of a column, as you can in JIRA. |
It seems to behave a bit differently now. Clicking the status names inside the modal cause the card to be moved to a position relative to its previous position in its previous column. For example if it was at the first position in the previous column, it'll move to the first position in the new column. If it's third, it'll move to third (or sometimes fourth) in the new column. |
Ah, so you mean moving into a column without dragging. I would guess we're simply applying the issue label (same as if done manually in GitHub) without touching the |
I honestly can't remember @dahlbyk - I could be persuaded that relative order between columns is not the ideal default though. |
Well "reusing" |
As far as I can remember, when a ticket was moved between columns historically, it'd always default to be at the top of the list, unless you dragged it to a specific spot. That no longer seems to be the case, and instead tickets are added to the very bottom of the given column. Was this change intentional? Is there any chance we could introduce a setting to add back the original behavior?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: