You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a categorical target definition, could we use what is currently stored in model_tasks > output_type > categorical > type_id
to encode a mapping between integers and categories, so that we could have sample-based representations of categories? E.g. a table like
where type_id corresponds to the index of the sample and value corresponds to the number corresponding to the category. Noting that categorical targets are weird because the categories can show up as the type_id for pmf output_type but also as the value for the sample output_type.
In a categorical target definition, could we use what is currently stored in
model_tasks > output_type > categorical > type_id
to encode a mapping between integers and categories, so that we could have sample-based representations of categories? E.g. a table like
where type_id corresponds to the index of the sample and value corresponds to the number corresponding to the category. Noting that categorical targets are weird because the categories can show up as the type_id for pmf output_type but also as the value for the sample output_type.
Possibly related to the question about whether output_type should be a property of a target specifically or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: