From 55d0d0a4ee899b5f954e06bc094956ad02e38b3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vincent Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:34:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Remove Peer Haus, Add Google Form --- Policies/peer-feedback.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Policies/peer-feedback.md b/Policies/peer-feedback.md index b7f09b88..e928e878 100644 --- a/Policies/peer-feedback.md +++ b/Policies/peer-feedback.md @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ The peer feedback program applies to members and people on the member path. ## Process -1. Every January, all participants will engage in the peer feedback program using peer.haus. +1. Every January, all participants will engage in the peer feedback program. 2. Before beginning, all participants will review a one-pager document (to-be-produced) on soliciting, giving, and receiving effective feedback. 3. Each individual will identify three specific areas they would like feedback on. These areas should be co-op focused items that peers have a path to forming an opinion on (i.e., Internal work, mannerisms, attitude, but not client-project-specific tasks). Open-ended questions are encouraged, but it is the joint responsibility of the asker and the feedback-giver to make sure thoughtful, detailed feedback can be generated. For example: - *How can I grow in my ability to contribute to the co-op?* - *Do I participate effectively in strategic problem-solving? What’s working vs. not working?* - *Am I available and easy to connect with when people want time with me?* -4. Each participant will enter their questions on Peer Haus, assigned to their ‘team’ (which is everyone). Everyone will be able to see everyone else’s requests for feedback. This generates a flood of emails - sorry. +4. Each participant will enter their questions on a Google form. Everyone will be able to see everyone else’s requests for feedback but only the receiver can see the response. 5. We will use a random match generator such as drawnames.ca to assign two people to give feedback to each person. Each person will thus have to write feedback for two other people, which guarantees that everyone will receive at least two pieces of feedback. 6. All participants will contribute feedback on Peer Haus. Participants must, at minimum, write feedback for their assigned person but there is no restriction on writing feedback for others if you feel you have something to contribute. From 7b4a05701fe0b0f89871db40fe12cba6951ae130 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vincent Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:38:40 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Remove random assignment, replace with practice area team --- Policies/peer-feedback.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Policies/peer-feedback.md b/Policies/peer-feedback.md index e928e878..723ef302 100644 --- a/Policies/peer-feedback.md +++ b/Policies/peer-feedback.md @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ The peer feedback program applies to members and people on the member path. - *Do I participate effectively in strategic problem-solving? What’s working vs. not working?* - *Am I available and easy to connect with when people want time with me?* 4. Each participant will enter their questions on a Google form. Everyone will be able to see everyone else’s requests for feedback but only the receiver can see the response. -5. We will use a random match generator such as drawnames.ca to assign two people to give feedback to each person. Each person will thus have to write feedback for two other people, which guarantees that everyone will receive at least two pieces of feedback. -6. All participants will contribute feedback on Peer Haus. Participants must, at minimum, write feedback for their assigned person but there is no restriction on writing feedback for others if you feel you have something to contribute. +5. Participants must, at minimum, write feedback to their practice area team. +6. Everyone is encouraged to give feedback to as many colleagues as possible. ### Resources for soliciting, giving, and receiving feedback * [Seeds For Change](https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/feedback.pdf) From 6692936ed4c56bd313dcc4109501cf6a054aabad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vincent Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:39:22 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 3/5] Update Process and Outcomes --- Policies/peer-feedback.md | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Policies/peer-feedback.md b/Policies/peer-feedback.md index 723ef302..a27710dc 100644 --- a/Policies/peer-feedback.md +++ b/Policies/peer-feedback.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The peer feedback program applies to members and people on the member path. ## Process 1. Every January, all participants will engage in the peer feedback program. -2. Before beginning, all participants will review a one-pager document (to-be-produced) on soliciting, giving, and receiving effective feedback. +2. Before beginning, all participants will review a one-pager document on soliciting, giving, and receiving effective feedback. 3. Each individual will identify three specific areas they would like feedback on. These areas should be co-op focused items that peers have a path to forming an opinion on (i.e., Internal work, mannerisms, attitude, but not client-project-specific tasks). Open-ended questions are encouraged, but it is the joint responsibility of the asker and the feedback-giver to make sure thoughtful, detailed feedback can be generated. For example: - *How can I grow in my ability to contribute to the co-op?* - *Do I participate effectively in strategic problem-solving? What’s working vs. not working?* @@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ The peer feedback program applies to members and people on the member path. * [Seeds For Change](https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/feedback.pdf) ## Desired outcomes for peer feedback process: -- Everyone gets at least two pieces of anonymized feedback. -- Everyone is assigned two people to write for. +- Everyone gets anonymized feedback from their peers. - Everyone can self-select, if they so choose, to write feedback for additional people. - The person writing feedback knows who it’s for, but the person receiving it does not know who wrote it. - No one aside from the receiver is able to see the feedback. From 58da1fe825ffeb669eaa52238f9a709815042b02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vincent Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:39:52 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Update count --- Policies/peer-feedback.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Policies/peer-feedback.md b/Policies/peer-feedback.md index a27710dc..5756cc24 100644 --- a/Policies/peer-feedback.md +++ b/Policies/peer-feedback.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Peer feedback program ## Who it applies to -Generally speaking, there are two groups of people involved with Hypha: +Generally speaking, there are three groups of people involved with Hypha: - **Established member:** People who hold full membership in the co-op and are actively involved in the governance of Hypha. Generally able to act without support (but support is always nice). - **Member path:** People who work with the co-op with the intention to co-govern Hypha in the future. This can include new members who still need support, probationary members, and contractors or employees who are on the path to probationary membership. From 74ba4be94f5ff2deaa02068ccf50ecddcfa96192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: vincent Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:43:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Fix typo in peer feedback policy --- Policies/peer-feedback.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Policies/peer-feedback.md b/Policies/peer-feedback.md index 5756cc24..69400f9e 100644 --- a/Policies/peer-feedback.md +++ b/Policies/peer-feedback.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The peer feedback program applies to members and people on the member path. - *How can I grow in my ability to contribute to the co-op?* - *Do I participate effectively in strategic problem-solving? What’s working vs. not working?* - *Am I available and easy to connect with when people want time with me?* -4. Each participant will enter their questions on a Google form. Everyone will be able to see everyone else’s requests for feedback but only the receiver can see the response. +4. Each participant will enter their questions on a Google form. Everyone will be able to see everyone else’s requests for feedback but only the receiver can see the responses. 5. Participants must, at minimum, write feedback to their practice area team. 6. Everyone is encouraged to give feedback to as many colleagues as possible.