-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get rid of AIX linker option: -bnorwexec #162
Comments
In jdk21, this also has effect on FFI thunks (which are not generated in JIT codecache). |
zl-wang
added a commit
to zl-wang/openj9-openjdk-jdk22
that referenced
this issue
May 29, 2024
High-level: this linker option is oxymoronic with JIT environment (where executable code are generated on the fly anyway). At least for the time being before we figured out why default codeCache is allocated through malloc (instead of mmap or shmget, for which that linker option appeared to have no effect by my tests). Even after we figured it out eventually, it is a legitimate question what value this option provides for JIT environment. this also has effect on FFI thunks (which are not generated in JIT codecache). Issue ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk21#162
zl-wang
added a commit
to zl-wang/openj9-openjdk-jdk21
that referenced
this issue
May 29, 2024
High-level: this linker option is oxymoronic with JIT environment (where executable code are generated on the fly anyway). At least for the time being before we figured out why default codeCache is allocated through malloc (instead of mmap or shmget, for which that linker option appeared to have no effect by my tests). Even after we figured it out eventually, it is a legitimate question what value this option provides for JIT environment. this also has effect on FFI thunks (which are not generated in JIT codecache). Issue ibmruntimes#162
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
High-level: this linker option is oxymoronic with JIT environment (where executable code are generated on the fly anyway).
At least for the time being before we figured out why default codeCache is allocated through malloc (instead of mmap or shmget, for which that linker option appeared to have no effect by my tests).
Even after we figured it out eventually, it is a legitimate question what value this option provides for JIT environment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: