Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WGBIE suggestions for module #45

Open
RuthFG opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

WGBIE suggestions for module #45

RuthFG opened this issue May 9, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@RuthFG
Copy link

RuthFG commented May 9, 2018

Hello, Yesterday WGBIE suggested:

  1. That we could add a "notes/comments" field in the data call table to be filled out by stock coordinators
  2. they have asked what is the difference between major and serious impact form the drop down menu. It is not clear which of those is worse. Can we change the wording for one of them to "medium impact" or something like that?

Thanks

@Milldaz
Copy link
Collaborator

Milldaz commented May 9, 2018

  1. I thought there was a comment section?
  2. This was something I also had to ask Rui when he was going through it with me. I think we need to distinguish between a situation where it made the work very difficult, and rushed, vs a situation where it prevented the work from getting done at all. So perhaps 'Major' and 'Critical'/'Prohibitive'. But to be honest, it is probably best that a non-native speaker suggests understandable words.

@RuthFG
Copy link
Author

RuthFG commented May 10, 2018

  1. There is a comment section in the "feedback" part but not in the actual "data call preparation" part (where we specify is data is needed in InterCatch or accession etc). However after talking to Rui maybe it makes no sense to have a comment section in the data call part because remarks by stock coordinators may end up in an obscure cell that nobody will check out...
  2. clearer wording will help: 1. no impact/2. significant impact/3. major or critical impact (just a suggestion)

@mikeydrew
Copy link
Collaborator

@Rui-Catarino Thoughts on the following?

  1. You think a comments section should be added
  2. The wording for the impact categories; these can be updated by you guys here -> https://sid.ices.dk/Manage/vocabs.aspx and the vocab is DC_SubmissionTimelinessVocab

impact

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants