From 3ea985f3e52d09e59ba843b84ab419ba3573b7e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KianBV <91744358+KianBV@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 18:09:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update results.md
---
docs/project/results.md | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/project/results.md b/docs/project/results.md
index b6d3701..9f0cae7 100644
--- a/docs/project/results.md
+++ b/docs/project/results.md
@@ -12,6 +12,36 @@ The SIAH family recognizes its targets through a PXAXVXP degron motif [^E3_7], w
+## Selection of SIAH1/2 canonical targets
+
+The selection of canonical SIAH1/2 targets, needed to test the evolution logic, was performed based on the following criteria:
+
+1. The canonical substrate should be mainly cytoplasmic and not inserted or localised near the plasma membrane or in other cell organelles.
+2. The canonical Substrate should not natively form di- or other multi-mers as this could interfere with the selection system by tying two or more C-terminal RNAP subunits together.
+3. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) on the canonical substrate should not be necessary for its ubiquitination, as we cannot specifically control PTMs of substrates.
+4. The size of the canonical substrate should not exceed 300 amino acids in size, as this could also compromise our synthetic evolutionary system
+5. The structure of the protein and interaction with the selected E3 ligase (SIAH1/2) should be characterised.
+
+Based on these five criteria, we searched published ubiquitination databases (10.1093/database/baab010, 10.1093/nar/gkab962) for canonical substrates. EGLN1, EGLN3 and ɑ-Synuclein were selected as canonical substrates from the mentioned databases as they matched our criteria the best.
+
+| Canonical substrate | Protein size (aa) | Degron | Ubiquitination site | Canonical E3 ligase |
+| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- |
+| EGLN3 | 239 | 176-ADVEP-180 | K(159,172) | SIAH1/2 |
+| EGLN1 | 426 | 69-VGP-72, 376-VQP-379* | K256 | SIAH1/2 |
+| ɑ-Synuclein | 140 | 118-VDP-120 | K(6,10,12,21,23,32,34) | SIAH1/2 |
+
+* For EGLN1 accurate degron was not identified, though two VXP motifs exist of which at least one should act as SIAH1/2 degron.
+
+ɑ-Synuclein is well known for causing Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple systems atrophy (MSA). Therefore, optimization of SIAH1/2 binding to ɑ-Synuclein could be an attractive alternative evolution strategy in case reprogramming SIAH1/2 specificity does not work as planned.
+
+NLRP3 was selected as an evolutionary target, for its mentioned clinical relevance in hepatic and neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, NLRP3 is an attractive target as it contains two VXP motifs (at positions 200 and 707), located in disordered regions on the surface of NLRP3 (Figure). This motif seems to be highly conserved among canonical SIAH1/2 substrates. Therefore, we assume our target choice is limited to proteins naturally displaying this motif on its surface, while other residues involved in binding could be changed. This would allow an evolution of SIAH1/2 to adapt for recognizing different VXP surrounding residues, while retaining the conserved VXP binding motif. Furthermore, lysins are found within the VXP surrounding residues, which are needed for ubiquitination. Remarkably, one of these lysins (K689) is natively polyubiquitinated and leads to the canonical degradation of NLRP3 (Liang, Damianou, Di Daniel, & Kessler, 2021), hence suggesting that polyubiquitination of K689 is a viable strategy of inducing NLRP3 degradation. With 1036 amino acids and its potential for oligomerization, NLRP3 could constrain our evolutionary system. Thus two peptide fragments of NLRP3 containing the VXP motif as well as surrounding residues were incorporated in the selection system.
+
+
+
## Development of an E3 ligase PACE evolutionary system
### Ubiquitination-dependent selection logic
To evolve the SIAH1/2 E3 ubiquitin ligases using the PACE system, we needed to link the ligase’s activity directly to phage propagation. To achieve this, we utilised a modified T7 bacteriophage RNA polymerase (RNAP) that had been split into two halves. Normally, this split RNAP is inactive unless both halves are brought close together within the cell, forming a complete, functional complex. We designed a system where the RNAP halves would only assemble if the E3 ligase successfully ubiquitinated its target.
@@ -20,7 +50,7 @@ In this setup, one half of the RNAP is fused to ubiquitin, while the other half
@@ -33,7 +63,7 @@ We plan to run this system in a bioreactor to create a continuous evolutionary e
@@ -47,14 +77,14 @@ We tested if the E3 ligases SIAH1 and SIAH2 can trigger phage replication when a
We then looked at whether changing the target protein affects phage replication. We replaced EGLN3 (blue) with α-Synuclein (orange), which is also recognised by SIAH1/2. Changing the target protein changes the level of phage propagation. This shows that our system depends on SIAH1 or SIAH2 and the target protein interacting together.
@@ -62,7 +92,7 @@ Next, we looked at how changes in the degron would affect our system. We found t
We were able to show that phage propagation is dependent on both the substrate of the E3 ligase and the E3 ligase itself. However, we also observed a very high background phage propagation in our system. For our evolution to work, we need to be able to link phage proliferation to degron recognition, so this phage proliferation caused by other factors than the degron interferes with the use of this system for the directed evolution part of this project. The next step is to find out why this is happening and how we can modify our system so that it doesn't happen.
@@ -77,7 +107,7 @@ Both hypotheses lead to gIII expression independent of the E3 ligase activity. T
### How can we reduce unwanted, E3-ligase independent page propagation?
@@ -91,7 +121,7 @@ To this end, we propagated the SIAH1 SP phages in bacterial cells that contain a
## References