-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: availableport enhancements #3621
Conversation
availableport
enhancementsavailableport
enhancements
availableport
enhancementsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the contribution!!!
can you please also add a changelog? |
@iam-agf any update on this PR? |
Sorry for the super slow update. Many things happening, but I think now is ready! |
@iam-agf any updates? can you use the table tests in the test? |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3621 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 24.99% 25.11% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 286 287 +1
Lines 23489 23539 +50
==========================================
+ Hits 5871 5912 +41
- Misses 17090 17096 +6
- Partials 528 531 +3
|
Sorry for the late response. An apologize. I'll try to make it faster and correct next time. |
No worries! Thank you for the contribution 🚀 |
Currently
availableport.Find
only allows the user to ask for ports between44000
and55000
and there is no verification about if the ports returned are the same.With this pull request is fixed the last part and now the users can add through a struct different ranges of ports and a custom randomizer.
Also I added the tests for the editions made.