You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 2, 2018. It is now read-only.
Currently, user needs to specify the location of the search term (items/collections/albums).
Thus, if the user forgot or do not know that they need to specify the location first (e.g.: search "animal" in collections), then search will be conducted in only in Items, and generate "No items found".
Therefore, we have 2 suggestions:
Would it be an idea to make it more user friendly? Perhaps to have it like google search result? Thus, user just need to enter free search term, and the all search result will be provided, divided to items/collections/albums using tabs?
No result for albums and collections generate the same result: "No collections found!"
Shouldn't no result for albums generate result "No albums found!"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"2. No result for albums and collections generate the same result: "No collections found!"
Shouldn't no result for albums generate result "No albums found!"?"
=> fixed to no results found in recent releases.
Currently, user needs to specify the location of the search term (items/collections/albums).
Thus, if the user forgot or do not know that they need to specify the location first (e.g.: search "animal" in collections), then search will be conducted in only in Items, and generate "No items found".
Therefore, we have 2 suggestions:
Shouldn't no result for albums generate result "No albums found!"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: