Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explore and interpret SCENT results #15

Open
GGboy-Zzz opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

explore and interpret SCENT results #15

GGboy-Zzz opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@GGboy-Zzz
Copy link

GGboy-Zzz commented Oct 11, 2024

Thanks for your previous reply, I successfully completed the SCENT pipeline in multiome datasets included multiple celltypes. yet I have some questions about exploring and interpreting SCENT prediction results. I inputed known E2G links inferred from SCENIC+ tools, and tried to verify it using SCENT algorithm. Finally, based on the boot_basic_p<0.0005, I filtered out 1.4K out of 13k results. And I plotted the boot_basic_p and beta distribution before and after filter, I noticed there are a group of particularly strong negatively correlated E2Gs.
image
Do they have biological significance? Is the SCENT algorithm biased toward increasing the true positive rate?
Best regards!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant