Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Capped allocations #109

Open
p-offtermatt opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Capped allocations #109

p-offtermatt opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
priority: alignment-needed Features that need additional alignment on whether we want to have them at all or how to prioritize

Comments

@p-offtermatt
Copy link
Member

Screenshot 2024-09-15 at 00 02 04
@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt added the priority: alignment-needed Features that need additional alignment on whether we want to have them at all or how to prioritize label Oct 14, 2024
@p-offtermatt
Copy link
Member Author

This could be done by just adding a new entrypoint that computes the amount of underlying ATOM that voted on a proposal, but it might need extra work to store that information, since currently we only store the voting power.

@p-offtermatt p-offtermatt removed the v2 label Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority: alignment-needed Features that need additional alignment on whether we want to have them at all or how to prioritize
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@p-offtermatt