Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

style: fix/project name error #122

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

style: fix/project name error #122

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Anon-im
Copy link

@Anon-im Anon-im commented Nov 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Corrected a typo in the note line within msg_server.go. The word “initate” was changed to “initiate” to ensure accurate spelling. This minor fix improves readability and maintains a professional standard for the codebase.

Changes:
• Updated note line in the msg_server.go
file:

// if the deposit is failed, initate a withdrawal

Testing:
No functional code changes were made; only the error message text was updated. The change does not affect any logic or functionality, so existing tests (if any) should continue to pass without modification.

Closes: #124

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error handling for clearer messages and improved readability.
    • Added explicit permission checks for critical actions to enhance security.
    • Standardized event emissions for better debugging and monitoring.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected error message for deposit failures to improve accuracy.

  • Improvements

    • Reinforced validation logic for incoming requests to ensure only well-formed requests are processed.
    • Aligned response structures for consistency across methods.

@Anon-im Anon-im requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2024 20:04
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the MsgServer implementation in msg_server.go. Key modifications include improved error handling with clearer messages, the addition of permission checks for specific methods, standardized event emission logic, reinforced validation for incoming requests, and consistent response structures across methods. These updates aim to bolster the overall robustness and security of the message handling functions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go - Enhanced error handling with clearer messages.
- Added permission checks for methods: SetBridgeInfo, FinalizeTokenDeposit, UpdateOracle.
- Standardized event emission logic across methods.
- Reinforced validation logic for incoming requests.
- Aligned response structures for consistency.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where bunnies play,
Error messages clearer, brightening the day.
Permissions checked, events now flow,
Robust and secure, watch our system grow!
With each little change, our code hops high,
A joyful leap, as we reach for the sky! 🌟

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3965ef4 and 185d191.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
x/opchild/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

462-462: LGTM! Comment spelling fixed.

The typo correction from "initate" to "initiate" improves the readability of the code comment.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@beer-1
Copy link
Contributor

beer-1 commented Dec 17, 2024

seems this already fixed in #125

@beer-1 beer-1 closed this Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix/project name error
2 participants
@Anon-im @beer-1