You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current chosen method is to stitch within the adjacent stitch at .33, .66, .33, 0 through that stitch.
There are other methods that might be preferred.
Split stitch. Make sure the first stitch is small by subdividing it into small stitches.
Small triangle. Create a small triangle stitch at the end or beginning.
Divide the first stitch in two and perform a triple stitch (bean stitch). Similar to current.
Contingencies to be considered:
First stitch is smaller that 0.5 mm. (Length of 5)
Currently if you started with a stitch of length 0. Tie-On/Off would create 5 stitches of length 0.
Tie off non-trimmed long-jump
There's sometimes need to perform a really long jump operation, and sometimes these jump operations could be tied-off. Though it might be proper to just tell pyembroidery to Tie_Off in that case overtly, rather than have it looking around for such events. Or perhaps utilize the STITCH_BREAK command there.
In theory a properly streamlined version of this would replace the Tie-On Tie-Off settings with their mode and just add a mode for "do nothing". Such things would be breaking changes. And thus left for 1.3.x
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current chosen method is to stitch within the adjacent stitch at .33, .66, .33, 0 through that stitch.
There are other methods that might be preferred.
Contingencies to be considered:
In theory a properly streamlined version of this would replace the Tie-On Tie-Off settings with their mode and just add a mode for "do nothing". Such things would be breaking changes. And thus left for 1.3.x
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: