diff --git a/frontend/messages/en.json b/frontend/messages/en.json index 9428188d2..2055dd9d9 100644 --- a/frontend/messages/en.json +++ b/frontend/messages/en.json @@ -260,63 +260,63 @@ "sizeChoice4": "Authenticated users", "sizeChoice5": "Anonymous internet users", "easeOfDiscoveryText": "How easy is it for this group of threat agents to discover this vulnerability?", - "easeOfDiscoveryChoice1": "Practically impossible", - "easeOfDiscoveryChoice2": "Difficult", - "easeOfDiscoveryChoice3": "Easy", - "easeOfDiscoveryChoice4": "Automated tools available", - "easeOfExploitText": "How easy is it for this group of threat agents to actually exploit this vulnerability?", - "easeOfExploitChoice1": "Theoretical", - "easeOfExploitChoice2": "Difficult", - "easeOfExploitChoice3": "Easy", - "easeOfExploitChoice4": "Automated tools available", - "awarenessText": "How well known is this vulnerability to this group of threat agents?", - "awarenessChoice1": "Unknown", - "awarenessChoice2": "Hidden", - "awarenessChoice3": "Obvious", - "awarenessChoice4": "Public knowledge", - "intrusionDetectionText": "How likely is an exploit to be detected?", - "intrusionDetectionChoice1": "Active detection in application", - "intrusionDetectionChoice2": "Logged and reviewed", - "intrusionDetectionChoice3": "Logged without review", - "intrusionDetectionChoice4": "Not logged", - "financialDamageText": "How much financial damage will result from an exploit?", - "financialDamageChoice1": "Less than the cost to fix the vulnerability", - "financialDamageChoice2": "Minor effect on annual profit", - "financialDamageChoice3": "Significant effect on annual profit", - "financialDamageChoice4": "Bankruptcy", - "reputationDamageText": "Would an exploit result in reputation damage that would harm the business?", - "reputationDamageChoice1": "Minimal damage", - "reputationDamageChoice2": "Loss of major accounts", - "reputationDamageChoice3": "Loss of goodwill", - "reputationDamageChoice4": "Brand damage", - "nonComplianceText": "How much exposure does non-compliance introduce?", - "nonComplianceChoice1": "Minor violation", - "nonComplianceChoice2": "Clear violation", - "nonComplianceChoice3": "High profile violation", - "nonComplianceChoice4": "No exposure", - "privacyViolationText": "How much personally identifiable information could be disclosed?", - "privacyViolationChoice1": "One individual", - "privacyViolationChoice2": "Hundreds of people", - "privacyViolationChoice3": "Thousands of people", - "privacyViolationChoice4": "Millions of people", - "lossOfConfidentialityText": "How much data could be disclosed and how sensitive is it?", - "lossOfConfidentialityChoice1": "Minimal non-sensitive data disclosed", - "lossOfConfidentialityChoice2": "Minimal critical data or extensive non-sensitive data disclosed", - "lossOfConfidentialityChoice3": "Extensive critical data disclosed", - "lossOfConfidentialityChoice4": "All data disclosed", - "lossOfIntegrityText": "How much data could be corrupted and how damaged is it?", - "lossOfIntegrityChoice1": "Minimal slightly corrupt data", - "lossOfIntegrityChoice2": "Minimal seriously corrupt data", - "lossOfIntegrityChoice3": "Extensive slightly corrupt data", - "lossOfIntegrityChoice4": "Extensive seriously corrupt data", - "lossOfIntegrityChoice5": "All data totally corrupt", - "lossOfAvailabilityText": "How much service could be lost and how vital is it?", - "lossOfAvailabilityChoice1": "Minimal secondary services interrupted", - "lossOfAvailabilityChoice2": "Minimal primary or extensive secondary services interrupted", - "lossOfAvailabilityChoice3": "Extensive primary services interrupted", - "lossOfAvailabilityChoice4": "All services completely lost", - "lossOfAccountabilityText": "Are the threat agents' actions traceable to an individual?", - "lossOfAccountabilityChoice1": "Fully traceable", - "lossOfAccountabilityChoice2": "Possibly traceable", - "lossOfAccountabilityChoice3": "Completely anonymous" + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice1": "Practically impossible", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice2": "Difficult", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice3": "Easy", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice4": "Automated tools available", + "easeOfExploitText": "How easy is it for this group of threat agents to actually exploit this vulnerability?", + "easeOfExploitChoice1": "Theoretical", + "easeOfExploitChoice2": "Difficult", + "easeOfExploitChoice3": "Easy", + "easeOfExploitChoice4": "Automated tools available", + "awarenessText": "How well known is this vulnerability to this group of threat agents?", + "awarenessChoice1": "Unknown", + "awarenessChoice2": "Hidden", + "awarenessChoice3": "Obvious", + "awarenessChoice4": "Public knowledge", + "intrusionDetectionText": "How likely is an exploit to be detected?", + "intrusionDetectionChoice1": "Active detection in application", + "intrusionDetectionChoice2": "Logged and reviewed", + "intrusionDetectionChoice3": "Logged without review", + "intrusionDetectionChoice4": "Not logged", + "financialDamageText": "How much financial damage will result from an exploit?", + "financialDamageChoice1": "Less than the cost to fix the vulnerability", + "financialDamageChoice2": "Minor effect on annual profit", + "financialDamageChoice3": "Significant effect on annual profit", + "financialDamageChoice4": "Bankruptcy", + "reputationDamageText": "Would an exploit result in reputation damage that would harm the business?", + "reputationDamageChoice1": "Minimal damage", + "reputationDamageChoice2": "Loss of major accounts", + "reputationDamageChoice3": "Loss of goodwill", + "reputationDamageChoice4": "Brand damage", + "nonComplianceText": "How much exposure does non-compliance introduce?", + "nonComplianceChoice1": "Minor violation", + "nonComplianceChoice2": "Clear violation", + "nonComplianceChoice3": "High profile violation", + "nonComplianceChoice4": "No exposure", + "privacyViolationText": "How much personally identifiable information could be disclosed?", + "privacyViolationChoice1": "One individual", + "privacyViolationChoice2": "Hundreds of people", + "privacyViolationChoice3": "Thousands of people", + "privacyViolationChoice4": "Millions of people", + "lossOfConfidentialityText": "How much data could be disclosed and how sensitive is it?", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice1": "Minimal non-sensitive data disclosed", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice2": "Minimal critical data or extensive non-sensitive data disclosed", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice3": "Extensive critical data disclosed", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice4": "All data disclosed", + "lossOfIntegrityText": "How much data could be corrupted and how damaged is it?", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice1": "Minimal slightly corrupt data", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice2": "Minimal seriously corrupt data", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice3": "Extensive slightly corrupt data", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice4": "Extensive seriously corrupt data", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice5": "All data totally corrupt", + "lossOfAvailabilityText": "How much service could be lost and how vital is it?", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice1": "Minimal secondary services interrupted", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice2": "Minimal primary or extensive secondary services interrupted", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice3": "Extensive primary services interrupted", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice4": "All services completely lost", + "lossOfAccountabilityText": "Are the threat agents' actions traceable to an individual?", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice1": "Fully traceable", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice2": "Possibly traceable", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice3": "Completely anonymous" } diff --git a/frontend/messages/fr.json b/frontend/messages/fr.json index d8cf2c16d..af4371934 100644 --- a/frontend/messages/fr.json +++ b/frontend/messages/fr.json @@ -229,6 +229,94 @@ "residualInMatrixView": "Residuelle", "probability": "Probabilité", "riskLevels": "Niveaux de risque", + "riskLevel": "Niveau de risque", "cancel": "Annuler", - "save": "Enregistrer" + "save": "Enregistrer", + "NA": "N/A", + "threatAgentFactors": "Facteurs liés aux agents de menace", + "vulnerabilityFactors": "Facteurs de vulnérabilité", + "businessImpactFactors": "Facteurs d’impact sur les entreprises", + "technicalImpactFactors": "Facteurs d’impact techniques", + "assessmentVector": "Vecteur d'évaluation", + "skillLevelText": "Dans quelle mesure ce groupe d’agents menaçants est-il techniquement compétent ?", + "skillLevelChoice1": "Aucune compétence technique", + "skillLevelChoice2": "Quelques compétences techniques", + "skillLevelChoice3": "Utilisateur informatique avancé", + "skillLevelChoice4": "Compétences en réseau et en programmation", + "skillLevelChoice5": "Compétences en matière de pénétration de la sécurité", + "motiveText": "Dans quelle mesure ce groupe d’agents de menace est-il motivé à trouver et à exploiter cette vulnérabilité ?", + "motiveChoice1": "Récompense faible ou inexistante", + "motiveChoice2": "Récompense possible", + "motiveChoice3": "Récompense élevée", + "opportunityText": "Quelles ressources et opportunités sont nécessaires pour que ce groupe d’agents de menace trouve et exploite cette vulnérabilité ?", + "opportunityChoice1": "Accès complet ou ressources coûteuses requises", + "opportunityChoice2": "Accès spécialisé ou ressources requises", + "opportunityChoice3": "Certains accès ou ressources requis", + "opportunityChoice4": "Aucun accès ni ressources requis", + "sizeText": "Quelle est la taille de ce groupe d’agents menaçants ?", + "sizeChoice1": "Développeurs ou administrateurs système", + "sizeChoice2": "Utilisateurs intranet", + "sizeChoice3": "Les partenaires", + "sizeChoice4": "Utilisateurs authentifiés", + "sizeChoice5": "Internautes anonymes", + "easeOfDiscoveryText": "Est-il facile pour ce groupe d’agents menaçants de découvrir cette vulnérabilité ?", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice1": "Pratiquement impossible", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice2": "Difficile", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice3": "Facile", + "easeOfDiscoveryChoice4": "Outils automatisés disponibles", + "easeOfExploitText": "Dans quelle mesure est-il facile pour ce groupe d’agents menaçants d’exploiter cette vulnérabilité ?", + "easeOfExploitChoice1": "Théorique", + "easeOfExploitChoice2": "Difficile", + "easeOfExploitChoice3": "Facile", + "easeOfExploitChoice4": "Outils automatisés disponibles", + "awarenessText": "Dans quelle mesure cette vulnérabilité est-elle connue de ce groupe d’agents menaçants ?", + "awarenessChoice1": "Inconnu", + "awarenessChoice2": "Caché", + "awarenessChoice3": "Évident", + "awarenessChoice4": "Connaissance publique", + "intrusionDetectionText": "Quelle est la probabilité qu’un exploit soit détecté ?", + "intrusionDetectionChoice1": "Détection active dans l'application", + "intrusionDetectionChoice2": "Enregistré et examiné", + "intrusionDetectionChoice3": "Connecté sans avis", + "intrusionDetectionChoice4": "Non connecté", + "financialDamageText": "Quel préjudice financier résultera d’un exploit ?", + "financialDamageChoice1": "Moins que le coût de correction de la vulnérabilité", + "financialDamageChoice2": "Effet mineur sur le bénéfice annuel", + "financialDamageChoice3": "Effet significatif sur le bénéfice annuel", + "financialDamageChoice4": "La faillite", + "reputationDamageText": "Un exploit entraînerait-il une atteinte à la réputation qui nuirait à l’entreprise ?", + "reputationDamageChoice1": "Dommages minimes", + "reputationDamageChoice2": "Perte de grands comptes", + "reputationDamageChoice3": "Perte de bonne volonté", + "reputationDamageChoice4": "Dommages à la marque", + "nonComplianceText": "Quel degré d’exposition la non-conformité introduit-elle ?", + "nonComplianceChoice1": "Violation mineure", + "nonComplianceChoice2": "Violation claire", + "nonComplianceChoice3": "Violation très médiatisée", + "nonComplianceChoice4": "Aucune exposition", + "privacyViolationText": "Quelle quantité d’informations personnellement identifiables pourrait être divulguée ?", + "privacyViolationChoice1": "Un individu", + "privacyViolationChoice2": "Des centaines de personnes", + "privacyViolationChoice3": "Des milliers de personnes", + "privacyViolationChoice4": "Des millions de personnes", + "lossOfConfidentialityText": "Quelle quantité de données pourrait être divulguée et dans quelle mesure sont-elles sensibles ?", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice1": "Un minimum de données non sensibles divulguées", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice2": "Données critiques minimales ou données non sensibles étendues divulguées", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice3": "De nombreuses données critiques divulguées", + "lossOfConfidentialityChoice4": "Toutes les données divulguées", + "lossOfIntegrityText": "Quelle quantité de données pourrait être corrompue et dans quelle mesure ?", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice1": "Données minimales légèrement corrompues", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice2": "Données minimales sérieusement corrompues", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice3": "Données étendues légèrement corrompues", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice4": "De nombreuses données gravement corrompues", + "lossOfIntegrityChoice5": "Toutes les données totalement corrompues", + "lossOfAvailabilityText": "Quelle quantité de service pourrait être perdue et dans quelle mesure est-il vital ?", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice1": "Services secondaires minimes interrompus", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice2": "Services primaires minimes ou services secondaires étendus interrompus", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice3": "De nombreux services primaires interrompus", + "lossOfAvailabilityChoice4": "Tous les services complètement perdus", + "lossOfAccountabilityText": "Les actions des agents menaçants peuvent-elles être attribuées à un individu ?", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice1": "Entièrement traçable", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice2": "Peut-être traçable", + "lossOfAccountabilityChoice3": "Complètement anonyme" }