You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2020. It is now read-only.
Auditing the authors of an op-based CRDTs is very accessible: all the operations can have a distinct author.
State-based CRDTs don't have this property. How should a state-based CRDT keep track of the operations and authors? Ideally, this knowledge should be eventually garbage collection as the operations get older.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@satazor how does this relate to the latest work being done on versidag? Will we able to verify the authorship in history? If so, is it something provided by versidag?
I think they aren’t directly related but you can store what you want in versidag. In case of discussify, whenever a new head comes from another replica, we must somehow only accept that head if it was added by the same identity that created the comment initially and discard otherwise.
This whole topic needs to be discussed in depth, I’m mostly worried about the CRDT part. Once that is solved, any side-chain based on versidag will also be solved. Even if there are cases where it isn’t, we may add a filter option to the resolve function of versidag they could be verifying signatures.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Auditing the authors of an op-based CRDTs is very accessible: all the operations can have a distinct author.
State-based CRDTs don't have this property. How should a state-based CRDT keep track of the operations and authors? Ideally, this knowledge should be eventually garbage collection as the operations get older.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: