Skip to content

discuss multiple call to set_next_input #340

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Carreau opened this issue Sep 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

discuss multiple call to set_next_input #340

Carreau opened this issue Sep 9, 2018 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@Carreau
Copy link
Member

Carreau commented Sep 9, 2018

See #323,

before big split, we were making sure each execution requests would not trigger multiple set_next_input, that was due to ? triggering multiple set_next_input in a for loop and annoying some users.

I can see how calling multiple set_next_input could make sens, but I don't think the protection code should be in the kernel.

@Carreau Carreau added this to the wishlist milestone Sep 9, 2018
@minrk minrk changed the title discuss multiple call to sset_next_input discuss multiple call to set_next_input Sep 11, 2018
@krassowski
Copy link
Member

In JupyterLab we see that code like sum([1]).denominator? leads to unexpected an annoying behaviour (creating a next input instead of providing the help message), see jupyterlab/jupyterlab#12269. Is this issue related to it? Sorry I think I am missing some context, but I see a reference to ? syntax and I wonder if this also refers to%pinfo magic or is it a separate feature?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants