You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is in a similar vein as the +polite (#106) idea, but instead of indicating to a client that it shouldn't alert a person, it indicates that it should. Making this a new issue so as to not hijack the other one.
Mentions
The idea would be to decouple mentions/nickname-highlights from the message content itself. Besides providing for a standard way to ping someone by their nick, it could indicate if a +reply to a message is intended to alert the person replied to.
Additionally, it could provide for a field to search on for chathistory like ircv3/ircv3-specifications#438 sort of touches on.
Normal mention
@+mention=Bob :Alice PRIVMSG #ircv3 :Bob: good morning!
I think it's also worth supporting a concept of "silent" or "polite" mentions. Where a normal mention would be attention grabbing, such as with a push notification, a silent one would perhaps only be indicated by an unread notification badge, highlighted channel, or similar.
This could be done a different tag, such as by adding a +silent tag to indicate that all the mentions should be silent. Alternately, going more in line with the +polite idea if granularity is desired, the target in the +mention tag could be prefixed with ! or something to indicate that it's a silent mention.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I very much like the angle of this. I would suggest making this a CAP for cases where there is a +mention value for a user who wasn't specified in the user's message and the server can then know if they should notify about a mention by other means such as a server notice (which would only be as intrusive as having that many mentions anyway)
This is in a similar vein as the
+polite
(#106) idea, but instead of indicating to a client that it shouldn't alert a person, it indicates that it should. Making this a new issue so as to not hijack the other one.Mentions
The idea would be to decouple mentions/nickname-highlights from the message content itself. Besides providing for a standard way to ping someone by their nick, it could indicate if a
+reply
to a message is intended to alert the person replied to.Additionally, it could provide for a field to search on for
chathistory
like ircv3/ircv3-specifications#438 sort of touches on.Normal mention
Mention entire channel
A
+reply
with explicit mentionSilent Mentions
I think it's also worth supporting a concept of "silent" or "polite" mentions. Where a normal mention would be attention grabbing, such as with a push notification, a silent one would perhaps only be indicated by an unread notification badge, highlighted channel, or similar.
This could be done a different tag, such as by adding a
+silent
tag to indicate that all the mentions should be silent. Alternately, going more in line with the+polite
idea if granularity is desired, the target in the+mention
tag could be prefixed with!
or something to indicate that it's a silent mention.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: