Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on experimental configuration #9

Open
Sehun0819 opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Question on experimental configuration #9

Sehun0819 opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Sehun0819
Copy link

Hi. I met a trouble when I tried FreeFuzz on my machine. The problem is, I can’t reproduce the experiment. While experiment in paper spent 7.3 hours for all APIs of PyTorch, mine spent 33.5 hours only for torch.nn.functional.*(less than 100 APIs). I only ran CPU mode and the processor of my machine is at least comparable to the machine in paper.

I sent an email to Anjiang first, and he suspected slowdown due too big tensor shape. So I tried to find a configuration to set a range for the shape of tensors as he suggested, but I couldn’t find. Therefore, it would be appreciated if you let me know how to configure tensor size (or, any setting for executing FreeFuzz like the way you did in your paper). Thank you :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant