Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASPP or LargeFOV? Should be 76.35%. #44

Open
chenyzh28 opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

ASPP or LargeFOV? Should be 76.35%. #44

chenyzh28 opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@chenyzh28
Copy link

chenyzh28 commented Nov 2, 2018

I have a question about the performance. "This is in comparision to 75.54% that is acheived by using train_iter_20000.caffemodel released by authors, which can be replicated by running this file . The .pth model converted from .caffemodel using the first section also gives 75.54% mean IOU. " But when I checked the model file and the trained .pth file, I found that the model applied ASPP instead of LargeFOV, which means the model performance should have achieved 76.35% as depicted in the paper. Why the performance is 75.54?

deeplab

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant