You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a question about the performance. "This is in comparision to 75.54% that is acheived by using train_iter_20000.caffemodel released by authors, which can be replicated by running this file . The .pth model converted from .caffemodel using the first section also gives 75.54% mean IOU. " But when I checked the model file and the trained .pth file, I found that the model applied ASPP instead of LargeFOV, which means the model performance should have achieved 76.35% as depicted in the paper. Why the performance is 75.54?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a question about the performance. "This is in comparision to 75.54% that is acheived by using train_iter_20000.caffemodel released by authors, which can be replicated by running this file . The .pth model converted from .caffemodel using the first section also gives 75.54% mean IOU. " But when I checked the model file and the trained .pth file, I found that the model applied ASPP instead of LargeFOV, which means the model performance should have achieved 76.35% as depicted in the paper. Why the performance is 75.54?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: