BinaryNet in TensorFlow ?...

[Jony101K]

Hi Itay,

I read the BinaryNet paper and it seems very promising and suggests huge speed/power gain.
I am currently using TensorFlow framework and Im not familiar with Torch at all.
I was wondering if this great work can be converted to TF framework?
is it possible to implement it in TF? Have you maybe done this?

Many thanks!
Yonathan

[itayhubara]

Hi Yonathan,

Sorry for the delay.

Sure, just follow the a training algorithm as appeared in the paper. You
need to create a weights binarization function, replace the classic
activation function (e.g. ReLU) in your model with hard-tanh and sign and
don't forget to use batch normalization in your model.
I am currently working on some extensions to this work but if I'll have
some free time this week I'll create a TF version of BNN and publish it.
In the meantime you can try running our Theano code: https://github.com/
MatthieuCourbariaux/BinaryNet

Best,
Itay

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Jony101K [email protected] wrote:

Hi Itay,

I read the BinaryNet paper and it seems very promising and suggests huge
speed/power gain.
I am currently using TensorFlow framework and Im not familiar with Torch
at all.
I was wondering if this great work can be converted to TF framework?
is it possible to implement it in TF? Have you maybe done this?

Many thanks!
Yonathan

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#9, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGcabCUrXWbO3BZi7k_u0UgJtQbbFjnzks5qiFS9gaJpZM4JpTJv
.

[Jony101K]

Hi Itay,

Thanks for your response!

I have already tried implementing it in TF:

I initialized all my variables with the following function:

        def weight_variable(shape):
            initial = tf.random_uniform(shape, -1.0, 1.0)
            return fw(tf.Variable(initial))

where fw() is my binarization function:

    def fw(x):
        with G.gradient_override_map({"Floor": "Identity"}):
           #from range [-1,1] -> to range [0,1]
            x = tf.clip_by_value((x+1.)/2.,0,1)
           #from range [0,1] -> to hard [0,1]
            x = tf.round(x)
           #from hard [0,1] -> to hard [-1,1]
            x = 2*x-1
            return x

and instead of using Relu, I used my activation function fa():

    def fa(x):
        with G.gradient_override_map({"Sign": "Identity"}):
            # from x -> to hard [-1,0,1]
            x = tf.sign(x)
            x = fw(x)
            return x

What do you think?...
Did I miss anything in the weights/activation implementation?
Would you do it differently?

Many Thanks!
Yonathan

[axiaoyeah]

Hi, Jony101K
Can you succeed implementing this modle in TF? I think you at least need modify the grad computing about "tf.round" function. I'm very interested in implementing this model in TF，and I encounter some questions about batch normalization in TF. could you discuss with me this question or contact [email protected]

[Alexivia]

Hi @Jony101K,
Did you successfully implemented BNNs in TF?

Regards,
Alexandre

[abhishektyaagi]

I have been trying to implement it by myself. Is there any progress on the topic? @Jony101K or @itayhubara or @Alexivia

[Alexivia]

Hi @abhishek42
Not that I know of... I had to implement some "pseudo-binarisation" functions myself, based on https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160

[abhishektyaagi]

Hi @Alexivia , the link is broken

[Alexivia]

just copy and paste into your search bar

[abhishektyaagi]

Got it. Also, on the same topic, I saw an issue started by you which was closed as someone suggested to ask it on stack overflow, but i think it is really helpful for BNNs. Can you share the question from stack overflow (if you went there for help) or did you use the method pointed out in the same thread?

[Alexivia]

I ended up using something similar to what gaohuazuo answered, but without the Defun class, just with a normal Python function.

[abhishektyaagi]

Is it possible for you to publish your implementation because I am working on a similar thing and have been stuck with it for some time

…

On Aug 10, 2017 1:23 PM, "Alexandre Vieira" ***@***.***> wrote: I ended up using something similar to what gaohuazuo answered, but without the *Defun* class, just with a normal Python function. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALVdlMKUkNZCtFrl88TiZgOmWd9jSlJlks5sWrbwgaJpZM4JpTJv> .

[abhishektyaagi]

Is it possible for you to publish your implementation because I am working
on a similar thing and have been stuck with it for some time
…

[itayhubara]

I published my implementation in TF names https://github.com/itayhubara/BinaryNet.tf/.
Note that this is an incomplete implementation as I didn't use shift-base BN/AdaMax and the Square Hinge loss. I'll add them as well as additional datasets support soon. Please let me know if you find any bug

[vadimq]

I've reimplemented it in TF2 (using tf.keras) for myself, but maybe somebody would also find a use for it. It also doesn't include shift-based BN/AdaMax, but is otherwise similar to the Theano version and supports all 3 datasets from the paper.