Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Not achieving 100% coverage when using SAT4J in test instead of Plingeling #1

Open
ahmadsalim opened this issue Apr 26, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Not achieving 100% coverage when using SAT4J in test instead of Plingeling #1

ahmadsalim opened this issue Apr 26, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
bug

Comments

@ahmadsalim
Copy link

Try to investigate why the contact book example only reaches around 71% coverage when using SAT4J instead of the native Plingeling solver.
@ahmadsalim ahmadsalim added the bug label Apr 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ahmadsalim