type | stage | group | info | description |
---|---|---|---|---|
reference, dev |
none |
Development |
See the Technical Writers assigned to Development Guidelines: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments-to-development-guidelines |
GitLab development guidelines - testing best practices. |
Testing at GitLab is a first class citizen, not an afterthought. It's important we consider the design of our tests as we do the design of our features.
When implementing a feature, we think about developing the right capabilities the right way, which helps us narrow our scope to a manageable level. When implementing tests for a feature, we must think about developing the right tests, but then cover all the important ways the test may fail, which can quickly widen our scope to a level that is difficult to manage.
Test heuristics can help solve this problem. They concisely address many of the common ways bugs manifest themselves within our code. When designing our tests, take time to review known test heuristics to inform our test design. We can find some helpful heuristics documented in the Handbook in the Test Engineering section.
To run RSpec tests:
# run test for a file
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb
# run test for the example on line 10 on that file
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb:10
# run tests matching the example name has that string
bin/rspec spec/models/project_spec.rb -e associations
# run all tests, will take hours for GitLab codebase!
bin/rspec
Use Guard to continuously monitor for changes and only run matching tests:
bundle exec guard
When using spring and guard together, use SPRING=1 bundle exec guard
instead to make use of spring.
GitLab has a massive test suite that, without parallelization, can take hours to run. It's important that we make an effort to write tests that are accurate and effective as well as fast.
Test performance is important to maintaining quality and velocity, and has a direct impact on CI build times and thus fixed costs. We want thorough, correct, and fast tests. Here you can find some information about tools and techniques available to you to achieve that.
We make it easy to add capabilities to our examples by annotating the example or a parent context. Examples of these are:
:js
in feature specs, which runs a full JavaScript capable headless browser.:clean_gitlab_redis_cache
which provides a clean Redis cache to the examples.:request_store
which provides a request store to the examples.
Obviously we should reduce test dependencies, and avoiding capabilities also reduces the amount of set-up needed.
:js
is particularly important to avoid. This must only be used if the feature
test requires JavaScript reactivity in the browser, since using a headless
browser is much slower than parsing the HTML response from the app.
A common cause of slow tests is excessive creation of objects, and thus computation and DB time. Factories are essential to development, but they can make inserting data into the DB so easy that we may be able to optimize.
The two basic techniques to bear in mind here are:
- Reduce: avoid creating objects, and avoid persisting them.
- Reuse: shared objects, especially nested ones we do not examine, can generally be shared.
To avoid creation, it is worth bearing in mind that:
instance_double
andspy
are faster thanFactoryBot.build(...)
.FactoryBot.build(...)
and.build_stubbed
are faster than.create
.- Don't
create
an object whenbuild
,build_stubbed
,attributes_for
,spy
, orinstance_double
will do. Database persistence is slow!
Use Factory Doctor to find cases where database persistence is not needed in a given test.
# run test for path
FDOC=1 bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
A common change is to use build
or build_stubbed
instead of create
:
# Old
let(:project) { create(:project) }
# New
let(:project) { build(:project) }
Factory Profiler can help to identify repetitive database persistence via factories.
# run test for path
FPROF=1 bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
# to visualize with a flamegraph
FPROF=flamegraph bin/rspec spec/[path]/[to]/[spec].rb
A common change is to use let_it_be
:
# Old
let(:project) { create(:project) }
# New
let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
A common cause of a large number of created factories is factory cascades, which result when factories create and recreate associations.
They can be identified by a noticeable difference between total time
and top-level time
numbers:
total top-level total time time per call top-level time name
208 0 9.5812s 0.0461s 0.0000s namespace
208 76 37.4214s 0.1799s 13.8749s project
The table above shows us that we never create any namespace
objects explicitly
(top-level == 0
) - they are all created implicitly for us. But we still end up
with 208 of them (one for each project) and this takes 9.5 seconds.
In order to reuse a single object for all calls to a named factory in implicit parent associations,
FactoryDefault
can be used:
RSpec.describe API::Search, factory_default: :keep do
let_it_be(:namespace) { create_default(:namespace) }
Then every project we create will use this namespace
, without us having to pass
it as namespace: namespace
. In order to make it work along with let_it_be
, factory_default: :keep
must be explicitly specified. That will keep the default factory for every example in a suite instead of
recreating it for each example.
Maybe we don't need to create 208 different projects - we can create one and reuse it. In addition, we can see that only about 1/3 of the projects we create are ones we ask for (76/208), so there is benefit in setting a default value for projects as well:
let_it_be(:project) { create_default(:project) }
In this case, the total time
and top-level time
numbers match more closely:
total top-level total time time per call top-level time name
31 30 4.6378s 0.1496s 4.5366s project
8 8 0.0477s 0.0477s 0.0477s namespace
Running a spec with profiling is a good way to start optimizing a spec. This can be done with:
bundle exec rspec --profile -- path/to/spec_file.rb
Which includes information like the following:
Top 10 slowest examples (10.69 seconds, 7.7% of total time):
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable creates new cross-reference notes when the mentionable text is edited
1.62 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:164
Issue relative positioning behaves like a class that supports relative positioning .move_nulls_to_end manages to move nulls to the end, stacking if we cannot create enough space
1.39 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/relative_positioning_shared_examples.rb:88
Issue relative positioning behaves like a class that supports relative positioning .move_nulls_to_start manages to move nulls to the end, stacking if we cannot create enough space
1.27 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/relative_positioning_shared_examples.rb:180
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable extracts references from its reference property
0.99253 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:69
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable creates cross-reference notes
0.94987 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:101
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable when there are cached markdown fields sends in cached markdown fields when appropriate
0.94148 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:86
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable when there are cached markdown fields when the markdown cache is stale persists the refreshed cache so that it does not have to be refreshed every time
0.92833 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:153
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable when there are cached markdown fields refreshes markdown cache if necessary
0.88153 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:130
Issue behaves like an editable mentionable behaves like a mentionable generates a descriptive back-reference
0.86914 seconds ./spec/support/shared_examples/models/mentionable_shared_examples.rb:65
Issue#related_issues returns only authorized related issues for given user
0.84242 seconds ./spec/models/issue_spec.rb:335
Finished in 2 minutes 19 seconds (files took 1 minute 4.42 seconds to load)
277 examples, 0 failures, 1 pending
From this result, we can see the most expensive examples in our spec, giving us a place to start. The fact that the most expensive examples here are in shared examples means that any reductions are likely to have a larger impact as they are called in multiple places.
While isolated examples are very clear, and help serve the purpose of specs as specification, the following example shows how we can combine expensive actions:
subject { described_class.new(arg_0, arg_1) }
it 'creates an event' do
expect { subject.execute }.to change(Event, :count).by(1)
end
it 'sets the frobulance' do
expect { subject.execute }.to change { arg_0.reset.frobulance }.to('wibble')
end
it 'schedules a background job' do
expect(BackgroundJob).to receive(:perform_async)
subject.execute
end
If the call to subject.execute
is expensive, then we are repeating the same
action just to make different assertions. We can reduce this repetition by
combining the examples:
it 'performs the expected side-effects' do
expect(BackgroundJob).to receive(:perform_async)
expect { subject.execute }
.to change(Event, :count).by(1)
.and change { arg_0.frobulance }.to('wibble')
end
Be careful doing this, as this sacrifices clarity and test independence for performance gains.
When combining tests, consider using :aggregate_failures
, so that the full
results are available, and not just the first failure.
- Use a single, top-level
RSpec.describe ClassName
block. - Use
.method
to describe class methods and#method
to describe instance methods. - Use
context
to test branching logic. - Try to match the ordering of tests to the ordering within the class.
- Try to follow the Four-Phase Test pattern, using newlines to separate phases.
- Use
Gitlab.config.gitlab.host
rather than hard coding'localhost'
- Don't assert against the absolute value of a sequence-generated attribute (see Gotchas).
- Avoid using
expect_any_instance_of
orallow_any_instance_of
(see Gotchas). - Don't supply the
:each
argument to hooks since it's the default. - On
before
andafter
hooks, prefer it scoped to:context
over:all
- When using
evaluate_script("$('.js-foo').testSomething()")
(orexecute_script
) which acts on a given element, use a Capybara matcher beforehand (e.g.find('.js-foo')
) to ensure the element actually exists. - Use
focus: true
to isolate parts of the specs you want to run. - Use
:aggregate_failures
when there is more than one expectation in a test. - For empty test description blocks, use
specify
rather thanit do
if the test is self-explanatory. - Use
non_existing_record_id
/non_existing_record_iid
/non_existing_record_access_level
when you need an ID/IID/access level that doesn't actually exists. Using 123, 1234, or even 999 is brittle as these IDs could actually exist in the database in the context of a CI run.
simplecov
is used to generate code test coverage reports.
These are generated automatically on the CI, but not when running tests locally. To generate partial reports
when you run a spec file on your machine, set the SIMPLECOV
environment variable:
SIMPLECOV=1 bundle exec rspec spec/models/repository_spec.rb
Coverage reports are generated into the coverage
folder in the app root, and you can open these in your browser, for example:
firefox coverage/index.html
Use the coverage reports to ensure your tests cover 100% of your code.
NOTE: Note: Before writing a new system test, please consider not writing one!
- Feature specs should be named
ROLE_ACTION_spec.rb
, such asuser_changes_password_spec.rb
. - Use scenario titles that describe the success and failure paths.
- Avoid scenario titles that add no information, such as "successfully".
- Avoid scenario titles that repeat the feature title.
- Create only the necessary records in the database
- Test a happy path and a less happy path but that's it
- Every other possible path should be tested with Unit or Integration tests
- Test what's displayed on the page, not the internals of ActiveRecord models.
For instance, if you want to verify that a record was created, add
expectations that its attributes are displayed on the page, not that
Model.count
increased by one. - It's ok to look for DOM elements but don't abuse it since it makes the tests more brittle
Sometimes you may need to debug Capybara tests by observing browser behavior.
You can pause Capybara and view the website on the browser by using the
live_debug
method in your spec. The current page will be automatically opened
in your default browser.
You may need to sign in first (the current user's credentials are displayed in
the terminal).
To resume the test run, press any key.
For example:
$ bin/rspec spec/features/auto_deploy_spec.rb:34
Running via Spring preloader in process 8999
Run options: include {:locations=>{"./spec/features/auto_deploy_spec.rb"=>[34]}}
Current example is paused for live debugging
The current user credentials are: user2 / 12345678
Press any key to resume the execution of the example!
Back to the example!
.
Finished in 34.51 seconds (files took 0.76702 seconds to load)
1 example, 0 failures
live_debug
only works on JavaScript enabled specs.
Run the spec with CHROME_HEADLESS=0
, e.g.:
CHROME_HEADLESS=0 bin/rspec some_spec.rb
The test will go by quickly, but this will give you an idea of what's happening.
Using live_debug
with CHROME_HEADLESS=0
pauses the open browser, and does not
open the page again. This can be used to debug and inspect elements.
You can also add byebug
or binding.pry
to pause execution and step through
the test.
We use the capybara-screenshot
gem to automatically take a screenshot on
failure. In CI you can download these files as job artifacts.
Also, you can manually take screenshots at any point in a test by adding the methods below. Be sure to remove them when they are no longer needed! See https://github.com/mattheworiordan/capybara-screenshot#manual-screenshots for more.
Add screenshot_and_save_page
in a :js
spec to screenshot what Capybara
"sees", and save the page source.
Add screenshot_and_open_image
in a :js
spec to screenshot what Capybara
"sees", and automatically open the image.
The HTML dumps created by this are missing CSS. This results in them looking very different from the actual application. There is a small hack to add CSS which makes debugging easier.
Some classes are well-isolated from Rails and you should be able to test them
without the overhead added by the Rails environment and Bundler's :default
group's gem loading. In these cases, you can require 'fast_spec_helper'
instead of require 'spec_helper'
in your test file, and your test should run
really fast since:
- Gems loading is skipped
- Rails app boot is skipped
- GitLab Shell and Gitaly setup are skipped
- Test repositories setup are skipped
fast_spec_helper
also support autoloading classes that are located inside the
lib/
directory. It means that as long as your class / module is using only
code from the lib/
directory you will not need to explicitly load any
dependencies. fast_spec_helper
also loads all ActiveSupport extensions,
including core extensions that are commonly used in the Rails environment.
Note that in some cases, you might still have to load some dependencies using
require_dependency
when a code is using gems or a dependency is not located
in lib/
.
For example, if you want to test your code that is calling the
Gitlab::UntrustedRegexp
class, which under the hood uses re2
library, you
should either add require_dependency 're2'
to files in your library that
need re2
gem, to make this requirement explicit, or you can add it to the
spec itself, but the former is preferred.
It takes around one second to load tests that are using fast_spec_helper
instead of 30+ seconds in case of a regular spec_helper
.
GitLab's RSpec suite has made extensive use of let
(along with its strict, non-lazy
version let!
) variables to reduce duplication. However, this sometimes comes at the cost of clarity,
so we need to set some guidelines for their use going forward:
let!
variables are preferable to instance variables.let
variables are preferable tolet!
variables. Local variables are preferable tolet
variables.- Use
let
to reduce duplication throughout an entire spec file. - Don't use
let
to define variables used by a single test; define them as local variables inside the test'sit
block. - Don't define a
let
variable inside the top-leveldescribe
block that's only used in a more deeply-nestedcontext
ordescribe
block. Keep the definition as close as possible to where it's used. - Try to avoid overriding the definition of one
let
variable with another. - Don't define a
let
variable that's only used by the definition of another. Use a helper method instead. let!
variables should be used only in case if strict evaluation with defined order is required, otherwiselet
will suffice. Remember thatlet
is lazy and won't be evaluated until it is referenced.- Avoid referencing
subject
in examples. Use a named subjectsubject(:name)
, or alet
variable instead, so the variable has a contextual name. - If the
subject
is never referenced inside examples, then it's acceptable to define thesubject
without a name.
In some cases, there is no need to recreate the same object for tests again for each example. For example, a project and a guest of that project is needed to test issues on the same project, one project and user will do for the entire file.
As much as possible, do not implement this using before(:all)
or before(:context)
. If you do,
you would need to manually clean up the data as those hooks run outside a database transaction.
Instead, this can be achieved by using
let_it_be
variables and the
before_all
hook
from the test-prof
gem.
let_it_be(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) }
before_all do
project.add_guest(user)
end
This will result in only one Project
, User
, and ProjectMember
created for this context.
let_it_be
and before_all
are also available within nested contexts. Cleanup after the context
is handled automatically using a transaction rollback.
Note that if you modify an object defined inside a let_it_be
block,
then you must do one of the following:
- Reload the object as needed.
- Use the
let_it_be_with_reload
alias. - Specify the
reload
option to reload for every example.
let_it_be_with_reload(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:project, reload: true) { create(:project) }
You can also use the let_it_be_with_refind
alias, or specify the refind
option as well to completely load a new object.
let_it_be_with_refind(:project) { create(:project) }
let_it_be(:project, refind: true) { create(:project) }
ActiveSupport::Testing::TimeHelpers
can be used to verify things that are time-sensitive. Any test that exercises or verifies something time-sensitive
should make use of these helpers to prevent transient test failures.
Example:
it 'is overdue' do
issue = build(:issue, due_date: Date.tomorrow)
travel_to(3.days.from_now) do
expect(issue).to be_overdue
end
end
This section was moved to developing with feature flags.
The code exercised by a single GitLab test may access and modify many items of data. Without careful preparation before a test runs, and cleanup afterward, data can be changed by a test in such a way that it affects the behavior of following tests. This should be avoided at all costs! Fortunately, the existing test framework handles most cases already.
When the test environment does get polluted, a common outcome is
flaky tests. Pollution will often manifest as an order
dependency: running spec A followed by spec B will reliably fail, but running
spec B followed by spec A will reliably succeed. In these cases, you can use
rspec --bisect
(or a manual pairwise bisect of spec files) to determine which
spec is at fault. Fixing the problem requires some understanding of how the test
suite ensures the environment is pristine. Read on to discover more about each
data store!
This is managed for us by the database_cleaner
gem. Each spec is surrounded in
a transaction, which is rolled back once the test completes. Certain specs will
instead issue DELETE FROM
queries against every table after completion; this
allows the created rows to be viewed from multiple database connections, which
is important for specs that run in a browser, or migration specs, among others.
One consequence of using these strategies, instead of the well-known
TRUNCATE TABLES
approach, is that primary keys and other sequences are not
reset across specs. So if you create a project in spec A, then create a project
in spec B, the first will have id=1
, while the second will have id=2
.
This means that specs should never rely on the value of an ID, or any other sequence-generated column. To avoid accidental conflicts, specs should also avoid manually specifying any values in these kinds of columns. Instead, leave them unspecified, and look up the value after the row is created.
GitLab stores two main categories of data in Redis: cached items, and Sidekiq jobs.
In most specs, the Rails cache is actually an in-memory store. This is replaced
between specs, so calls to Rails.cache.read
and Rails.cache.write
are safe.
However, if a spec makes direct Redis calls, it should mark itself with the
:clean_gitlab_redis_cache
, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state
or
:clean_gitlab_redis_queues
traits as appropriate.
By default, Sidekiq jobs are enqueued into a jobs array and aren't processed.
If a test queues Sidekiq jobs and need them to be processed, the
:sidekiq_inline
trait can be used.
The :sidekiq_might_not_need_inline
trait was added when Sidekiq inline mode was
changed to fake mode
to all the tests that needed Sidekiq to actually process jobs. Tests with
this trait should be either fixed to not rely on Sidekiq processing jobs, or their
:sidekiq_might_not_need_inline
trait should be updated to :sidekiq_inline
if
the processing of background jobs is needed/expected.
The usage of perform_enqueued_jobs
is useful only for testing delayed mail
deliveries, because our Sidekiq workers aren't inheriting from ApplicationJob
/ ActiveJob::Base
.
DNS requests are stubbed universally in the test suite
(as of !22368), as DNS can
cause issues depending on the developer's local network. There are RSpec labels
available in spec/support/dns.rb
which you can apply to tests if you need to
bypass the DNS stubbing, e.g.:
it "really connects to Prometheus", :permit_dns do
And if you need more specific control, the DNS blocking is implemented in
spec/support/helpers/dns_helpers.rb
and these methods can be called elsewhere.
In the situations where you need to
stub
methods such as File.read
, make sure to:
- Stub
File.read
for only the filepath you are interested in. - Call the original implementation for other filepaths.
Otherwise File.read
calls from other parts of the codebase get
stubbed incorrectly. You should use the stub_file_read
, and
expect_file_read
helper methods which does the stubbing for
File.read
correctly.
# bad, all Files will read and return nothing
allow(File).to receive(:read)
# good
stub_file_read(my_filepath)
# also OK
allow(File).to receive(:read).and_call_original
allow(File).to receive(:read).with(my_filepath)
Filesystem data can be roughly split into "repositories", and "everything else".
Repositories are stored in tmp/tests/repositories
. This directory is emptied
before a test run starts, and after the test run ends. It is not emptied between
specs, so created repositories accumulate within this directory over the
lifetime of the process. Deleting them is expensive, but this could lead to
pollution unless carefully managed.
To avoid this, hashed storage is enabled in the test suite. This means that repositories are given a unique path that depends on their project's ID. Since the project IDs are not reset between specs, this guarantees that each spec gets its own repository on disk, and prevents changes from being visible between specs.
If a spec manually specifies a project ID, or inspects the state of the
tmp/tests/repositories/
directory directly, then it should clean up the
directory both before and after it runs. In general, these patterns should be
completely avoided.
Other classes of file linked to database objects, such as uploads, are generally managed in the same way. With hashed storage enabled in the specs, they are written to disk in locations determined by ID, so conflicts should not occur.
Some specs disable hashed storage by passing the :legacy_storage
trait to the
projects
factory. Specs that do this must never override the path
of the
project, or any of its groups. The default path includes the project ID, so will
not conflict; but if two specs create a :legacy_storage
project with the same
path, they will use the same repository on disk and lead to test environment
pollution.
Other files must be managed manually by the spec. If you run code that creates a
tmp/test-file.csv
file, for instance, the spec must ensure that the file is
removed as part of cleanup.
All the specs in a given rspec
run share the same Ruby process, which means
they can affect each other by modifying Ruby objects that are accessible between
specs. In practice, this means global variables, and constants (which includes
Ruby classes, modules, etc).
Global variables should generally not be modified. If absolutely necessary, a block like this can be used to ensure the change is rolled back afterwards:
around(:each) do |example|
old_value = $0
begin
$0 = "new-value"
example.run
ensure
$0 = old_value
end
end
If a spec needs to modify a constant, it should use the stub_const
helper to
ensure the change is rolled back.
If you need to modify the contents of the ENV
constant, you can use the
stub_env
helper method instead.
While most Ruby instances are not shared between specs, classes
and modules generally are. Class and module instance variables, accessors,
class variables, and other stateful idioms, should be treated in the same way as
global variables - don't modify them unless you have to! In particular, prefer
using expectations, or dependency injection along with stubs, to avoid the need
for modifications. If you have no other choice, an around
block similar to the
example for global variables, above, can be used, but this should be avoided if
at all possible.
CAUTION: Warning:
Snowplow performs runtime type checks by using the contracts gem.
Since Snowplow is by default disabled in tests and development, it can be hard to
catch exceptions when mocking Gitlab::Tracking
.
To catch runtime errors due to type checks, you can enable Snowplow in tests by marking the spec with
:snowplow
and use the expect_snowplow_event
helper which will check for
calls to Gitlab::Tracking#event
.
describe '#show', :snowplow do
it 'tracks snowplow events' do
get :show
expect_snowplow_event(
category: 'Experiment',
action: 'start',
)
expect_snowplow_event(
category: 'Experiment',
action: 'sent',
property: 'property',
label: 'label'
)
end
end
When you want to ensure that no event got called, you can use expect_no_snowplow_event
.
describe '#show', :snowplow do
it 'does not track any snowplow events' do
get :show
expect_no_snowplow_event
end
end
This style of testing is used to exercise one piece of code with a comprehensive range of inputs. By specifying the test case once, alongside a table of inputs and the expected output for each, your tests can be made easier to read and more compact.
We use the RSpec::Parameterized gem. A short example, using the table syntax and checking Ruby equality for a range of inputs, might look like this:
describe "#==" do
using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
where(:a, :b, :result) do
1 | 1 | true
1 | 2 | false
true | true | true
true | false | false
end
with_them do
it { expect(a == b).to eq(result) }
it 'is isomorphic' do
expect(b == a).to eq(result)
end
end
end
CAUTION: Caution:
Only use simple values as input in the where
block. Using procs, stateful
objects, FactoryBot-created objects etc. can lead to
unexpected results.
Prometheus metrics may be preserved from one test run to another. To ensure that metrics are
reset before each example, add the :prometheus
tag to the RSpec test.
Custom matchers should be created to clarify the intent and/or hide the
complexity of RSpec expectations. They should be placed under
spec/support/matchers/
. Matchers can be placed in subfolder if they apply to
a certain type of specs only (e.g. features, requests etc.) but shouldn't be if
they apply to multiple type of specs.
Time returned from a database can differ in precision from time objects
in Ruby, so we need flexible tolerances when comparing in specs. We can
use be_like_time
to compare that times are within one second of each
other.
Example:
expect(metrics.merged_at).to be_like_time(time)
Prefer have_gitlab_http_status
over have_http_status
and
expect(response.status).to
because the former
could also show the response body whenever the status mismatched. This would
be very useful whenever some tests start breaking and we would love to know
why without editing the source and rerun the tests.
This is especially useful whenever it's showing 500 internal server error.
Prefer named HTTP status like :no_content
over its numeric representation
206
. See a list of supported status codes.
Example:
expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
Testing query performance allows us to:
- Assert that N+1 problems do not exist within a block of code.
- Ensure that the number of queries within a block of code does not increase unnoticed.
QueryRecorder
allows profiling and testing of the number of database queries
performed within a given block of code.
See the QueryRecorder
section for more details.
Gitlab::GitalyClient.get_request_count
allows tests of the number of Gitaly queries
made by a given block of code:
See the Gitaly Request Counts
section for more details.
Shared contexts only used in one spec file can be declared inline. Any shared contexts used by more than one spec file:
- Should be placed under
spec/support/shared_contexts/
. - Can be placed in subfolder if they apply to a certain type of specs only (e.g. features, requests etc.) but shouldn't be if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Each file should include only one context and have a descriptive name, e.g.
spec/support/shared_contexts/controllers/githubish_import_controller_shared_context.rb
.
Shared examples only used in one spec file can be declared inline. Any shared examples used by more than one spec file:
- Should be placed under
spec/support/shared_examples/
. - Can be placed in subfolder if they apply to a certain type of specs only (e.g. features, requests etc.) but shouldn't be if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Each file should include only one context and have a descriptive name, e.g.
spec/support/shared_examples/controllers/githubish_import_controller_shared_example.rb
.
Helpers are usually modules that provide some methods to hide the complexity of
specific RSpec examples. You can define helpers in RSpec files if they're not
intended to be shared with other specs. Otherwise, they should be placed
under spec/support/helpers/
. Helpers can be placed in subfolder if they apply
to a certain type of specs only (e.g. features, requests etc.) but shouldn't be
if they apply to multiple type of specs.
Helpers should follow the Rails naming / namespacing convention. For instance
spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
should define:
module Spec
module Support
module Helpers
module CycleAnalyticsHelpers
def create_commit_referencing_issue(issue, branch_name: random_git_name)
project.repository.add_branch(user, branch_name, 'master')
create_commit("Commit for ##{issue.iid}", issue.project, user, branch_name)
end
end
end
end
end
Helpers should not change the RSpec configuration. For instance, the helpers module described above should not include:
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include Spec::Support::Helpers::CycleAnalyticsHelpers
end
GitLab uses factory_bot as a test fixture replacement.
- Factory definitions live in
spec/factories/
, named using the pluralization of their corresponding model (User
factories are defined inusers.rb
). - There should be only one top-level factory definition per file.
- FactoryBot methods are mixed in to all RSpec groups. This means you can (and
should) call
create(...)
instead ofFactoryBot.create(...)
. - Make use of traits to clean up definitions and usages.
- When defining a factory, don't define attributes that are not required for the resulting record to pass validation.
- When instantiating from a factory, don't supply attributes that aren't required by the test.
- Prefer implicit
or explicit
association definitions instead of using
create
/build
for association setup. See issue #262624 for further context. - Factories don't have to be limited to
ActiveRecord
objects. See example.
All fixtures should be placed under spec/fixtures/
.
Testing some functionality, e.g., merging a merge request, requires a Git
repository with a certain state to be present in the test environment. GitLab
maintains the gitlab-test
repository for certain common cases - you can ensure a copy of the repository is
used with the :repository
trait for project factories:
let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
Where you can, consider using the :custom_repo
trait instead of :repository
.
This allows you to specify exactly what files will appear in the master
branch
of the project's repository. For example:
let(:project) do
create(
:project, :custom_repo,
files: {
'README.md' => 'Content here',
'foo/bar/baz.txt' => 'More content here'
}
)
end
This will create a repository containing two files, with default permissions and the specified content.
RSpec configuration files are files that change the RSpec configuration (i.e.
RSpec.configure do |config|
blocks). They should be placed under
spec/support/
.
Each file should be related to a specific domain, e.g.
spec/support/capybara.rb
, spec/support/carrierwave.rb
, etc.
If a helpers module applies only to a certain kind of specs, it should add
modifiers to the config.include
call. For instance if
spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
applies to :lib
and
type: :model
specs only, you would write the following:
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include Spec::Support::Helpers::CycleAnalyticsHelpers, :lib
config.include Spec::Support::Helpers::CycleAnalyticsHelpers, type: :model
end
If a configuration file only consists of config.include
, you can add these
config.include
directly in spec/spec_helper.rb
.
For very generic helpers, consider including them in the spec/support/rspec.rb
file which is used by the spec/fast_spec_helper.rb
file. See
Fast unit tests for more details about the
spec/fast_spec_helper.rb
file.
Services for the test environment are automatically configured and started when tests are run, including Gitaly, Workhorse, Elasticsearch, and Capybara. When run in CI, or if the service needs to be installed, the test environment will log information about set-up time, producing log messages like the following:
==> Setting up Gitaly...
Gitaly set up in 31.459649 seconds...
==> Setting up GitLab Workhorse...
GitLab Workhorse set up in 29.695619 seconds...
fatal: update refs/heads/diff-files-symlink-to-image: invalid <newvalue>: 8cfca84
From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-test
* [new branch] diff-files-image-to-symlink -> origin/diff-files-image-to-symlink
* [new branch] diff-files-symlink-to-image -> origin/diff-files-symlink-to-image
* [new branch] diff-files-symlink-to-text -> origin/diff-files-symlink-to-text
* [new branch] diff-files-text-to-symlink -> origin/diff-files-text-to-symlink
b80faa8..40232f7 snippet/multiple-files -> origin/snippet/multiple-files
* [new branch] testing/branch-with-#-hash -> origin/testing/branch-with-#-hash
==> Setting up GitLab Elasticsearch Indexer...
GitLab Elasticsearch Indexer set up in 26.514623 seconds...
This information is omitted when running locally and when no action needs to be performed. If you would always like to see these messages, set the following environment variable:
GITLAB_TESTING_LOG_LEVEL=debug