You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Chain combinators more often than might be expected require type ascriptions when used with regular lambdas. This is because there is no first bracket to fix the type of the chain.
Describe the solution you'd like
Use chain.x1(p)(op) instead of chain.x1(p, op), which will allow better inference on the op. Problem is, however, that the inference for infix.x1 will still not be great because of the B parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Chain combinators more often than might be expected require type ascriptions when used with regular lambdas. This is because there is no first bracket to fix the type of the chain.
Describe the solution you'd like
Use
chain.x1(p)(op)
instead ofchain.x1(p, op)
, which will allow better inference on the op. Problem is, however, that the inference forinfix.x1
will still not be great because of theB
parameter.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: