Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider security rules for static/dynamic code analysis #11

Open
javabeanz opened this issue Feb 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Consider security rules for static/dynamic code analysis #11

javabeanz opened this issue Feb 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
status:team discussion The team needs to discuss how to deal with the issue's request type:enhancement Enhancement of the functionality of the software

Comments

@javabeanz
Copy link

Great project guys !

I was wondering if jqassistant is capable of making software more security by creating rules specifically for security analysis. Data flow, control flow, semantic -, structural -, configuration -, and buffer analysis are a lot easier once you have a full AST. As an example, PMD has a special rule set for security : https://github.com/GDSSecurity/GDS-PMD-Security-Rules.

@obfischer
Copy link
Contributor

We consider to support such analyses. But it requires to collect much more information on the source code base then we do it now.
One of the next releases will provide support for a much more detailed scan of classes. This would be the base for such analyses.
We will take your issue as feature request to support such kind of analysis.

@javabeanz
Copy link
Author

Thanks ! I am very interested and willing to help.

@obfischer obfischer transferred this issue from jQAssistant/jqassistant Feb 28, 2020
@obfischer obfischer added the type:enhancement Enhancement of the functionality of the software label Feb 28, 2020
@obfischer obfischer self-assigned this May 27, 2020
@obfischer obfischer added the status:team discussion The team needs to discuss how to deal with the issue's request label Mar 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:team discussion The team needs to discuss how to deal with the issue's request type:enhancement Enhancement of the functionality of the software
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants