Tendermint provides a deterministic, Byzantine fault-tolerant, source of time. Time in Tendermint is defined with the Time field of the block header.
It satisfies the following properties:
- Time Monotonicity: Time is monotonically increasing, i.e., given
a header H1 for height h1 and a header H2 for height
h2 = h1 + 1
,H1.Time < H2.Time
. - Time Validity: Given a set of Commit votes that forms the
block.LastCommit
field, a range of valid values for the Time field of the block header is defined only by
Precommit messages (from the LastCommit field) sent by correct processes, i.e., a faulty process cannot arbitrarily increase the Time value.
In the context of Tendermint, time is of type int64 and denotes UNIX time in milliseconds, i.e., corresponds to the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970. Before defining rules that need to be enforced by the Tendermint consensus protocol, so the properties above holds, we introduce the following definition:
- median of a set of
Vote
messages is equal to the median ofVote.Time
fields of the correspondingVote
messages, where the value ofVote.Time
is counted number of times proportional to the process voting power. As in Tendermint the voting power is not uniform (one process one vote), a vote message is actually an aggregator of the same votes whose number is equal to the voting power of the process that has casted the corresponding votes message.
Let's consider the following example:
- we have four processes p1, p2, p3 and p4, with the following voting power distribution (p1, 23), (p2, 27), (p3, 10)
and (p4, 10). The total voting power is 70 (
N = 3f+1
, whereN
is the total voting power, andf
is the maximum voting power of the faulty processes), so we assume that the faulty processes have at most 23 of voting power. Furthermore, we have the following vote messages in some LastCommit field (we ignore all fields except Time field):- (p1, 100), (p2, 98), (p3, 1000), (p4, 500). We assume that p3 and p4 are faulty processes. Let's assume that the
block.LastCommit
message contains votes of processes p2, p3 and p4. Median is then chosen the following way: the value 98 is counted 27 times, the value 1000 is counted 10 times and the value 500 is counted also 10 times. So the median value will be the value 98. No matter what set of messages with at least2f+1
voting power we choose, the median value will always be between the values sent by correct processes.
- (p1, 100), (p2, 98), (p3, 1000), (p4, 500). We assume that p3 and p4 are faulty processes. Let's assume that the
We ensure Time Monotonicity and Time Validity properties by the following rules:
-
let rs denotes
RoundState
(consensus internal state) of some process. Thenrs.ProposalBlock.Header.Time == median(rs.LastCommit) && rs.Proposal.Timestamp == rs.ProposalBlock.Header.Time
. -
Furthermore, when creating the
vote
message, the following rules for determiningvote.Time
field should hold:-
if
rs.Proposal
is defined thenvote.Time = max(rs.Proposal.Timestamp + 1, time.Now())
, wheretime.Now()
denotes local Unix time in milliseconds. -
if
rs.Proposal
is not defined andrs.Votes
contains +2/3 of the corresponding vote messages (votes for the current height and round, and with the corresponding type (Prevote
orPrecommit
)), then
vote.Time = max(median(getVotes(rs.Votes, vote.Height, vote.Round, vote.Type)), time.Now())
,where
getVotes
function returns the votes for particularHeight
,Round
andType
.
The second rule is relevant for the case when a process jumps to a higher round upon receiving +2/3 votes for a higher round, but the correspondingProposal
message for the higher round hasn't been received yet. -