Status of openHIM mediator response is ambiguous

[armageddon]

The string status value of the mediator response is ambiguous. Does it mean :
Primary Route succeeded and secondary routes failed?
Some parts of the mediation succeeded and some failed?

How does this relate to the actual response code of the mediator request?
How do either of these relate to the response code of the request section in the response body?

Should there be rules about orchestration response codes and the response code in the request section of the body?

[rcrichton]

The response status is now described here: https://github.com/jembi/openhim-core-js/wiki/RESTful-API-reference#transactions-resource However, it has been expressed that this is confusing and that we should think of ways to make this easiest to understand.

[rcrichton]

Additional comments for @carlsbox:

Yes these are a little confusing. The word complete can be defined as "having all the necessary or appropriate parts." or meaning all done. in the definition here it seems that we are saying complete but not successful? this isn't making very much sense to an average user like me. We may need a legend and a good way to apss this is to ask it on the community on how best to phrase this and expand the legend. A good litmus paper test is to give it so someone like Chris in a blind manner (i.e. not seeing it before) and see what he thinks is going on.