Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using EMA on the generator markedly improves the validation loss #33

Open
erogol opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Using EMA on the generator markedly improves the validation loss #33

erogol opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@erogol
Copy link

erogol commented Sep 17, 2024

Since there was to much fluctuation in the validation loss, I tried EMA with the generator parameters and it improved the validation loss and subjective quality a lot

image
@erogol
Copy link
Author

erogol commented Sep 17, 2024

there are bing jumps when commitment loss reduces suddenly due to probably reassignment of the codebooks

@jishengpeng
Copy link
Owner

Since there was to much fluctuation in the validation loss, I tried EMA with the generator parameters and it improved the validation loss and subjective quality a lot

image

Thanks for the reminder, we will try EMA in WavTokenizer2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants