Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there a better way to do type comparisons? #9

Open
serialhobbyist opened this issue Oct 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Is there a better way to do type comparisons? #9

serialhobbyist opened this issue Oct 5, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@serialhobbyist
Copy link

I was trying to test a returned object's type but I couldn't make it work in a good way.

$obj = @()
$obj | should be [Array]

gives

Expected that (actual) () be ([Array]).

I can, of course, do:

$obj -is [Array] | should be $true

but when it's not true I get

Expected that (actual) (False) be (True)

rather than the actual type. Is there a way to write it such that I get the type back when it fails?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant