Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abstract operational actions? (start/stop/install/remove/etc #27

Open
jordansissel opened this issue Mar 10, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Abstract operational actions? (start/stop/install/remove/etc #27

jordansissel opened this issue Mar 10, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@jordansissel
Copy link
Owner

A chat with @coderanger on IRC about implementing a pleaserun chef resource type, he gave a convincing argument for why pleaserun's abstraction should be extended to include operational actions like start and stop.

Sounds good to me! Let's figure out what that would look like.

@igalic
Copy link
Contributor

igalic commented Mar 10, 2014

What was that convincing argument?

@jordansissel
Copy link
Owner Author

(summarizing the conversation I had with @coderanger about this)

I suppose it was two parts. First, the small claim that Chef doesn't handle different service types very well. Puppet may have the lead here, but Chef has 'service' and 'runit_service' and 'supervisor_service' and such instead of one unifying resource type with multiple providers (intentionally? accidentally? It doesn't matter). Second, that since pleaserun already has this notion of actions (install_actions), it's not a stretch to try generalizing that idea to other kinds of actions (start, stop, and remove actions).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants