You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A chat with @coderanger on IRC about implementing a pleaserun chef resource type, he gave a convincing argument for why pleaserun's abstraction should be extended to include operational actions like start and stop.
Sounds good to me! Let's figure out what that would look like.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(summarizing the conversation I had with @coderanger about this)
I suppose it was two parts. First, the small claim that Chef doesn't handle different service types very well. Puppet may have the lead here, but Chef has 'service' and 'runit_service' and 'supervisor_service' and such instead of one unifying resource type with multiple providers (intentionally? accidentally? It doesn't matter). Second, that since pleaserun already has this notion of actions (install_actions), it's not a stretch to try generalizing that idea to other kinds of actions (start, stop, and remove actions).
A chat with @coderanger on IRC about implementing a
pleaserun
chef resource type, he gave a convincing argument for why pleaserun's abstraction should be extended to include operational actions likestart
andstop
.Sounds good to me! Let's figure out what that would look like.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: