You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I checked the librarian module and the catalog cross-matching is based on position. Given Gaia sources, can the Librarian class include a logic where a given photometry is excluded (or at least flagged) if there is any unresolved sources near the target? Right now, my heuristic is re-run ariadne until I discarded all photometries that deviate too much e.g. >3-sigma from the best-fit SED.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I had planned on doing some sort of further quality check on the photometry but haven't gotten around to it. If you have an idea of how I could identify unresolved targets near the actual target, I'd be happy to hear it!
I don't have a specific solution but today I came across this paper (See Sec 2 & 3.1) which discusses how they take into account contamination in cross-matching.
I checked the
librarian
module and the catalog cross-matching is based on position. Given Gaia sources, can theLibrarian
class include a logic where a given photometry is excluded (or at least flagged) if there is any unresolved sources near the target? Right now, my heuristic is re-run ariadne until I discarded all photometries that deviate too much e.g. >3-sigma from the best-fit SED.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: