You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have encountered a problem with the way the software interprets the structure of a bicyclic molecule, leading to incorrect results in the output. Specifically, the molecule in question consists of a bicyclic structure where only one of the rings is aromatic. However, during processing, both rings are incorrectly interpreted as aromatic. Additionally, the non-aromatic ring is also treated as planar, which is not chemically accurate and affects downstream results when working with this ligand in complex with a protein.
For example, consider the structure of the input molecule shown below:
When this ligand is processed with the protein, the output structure incorrectly identifies both rings as aromatic and planar. You can see my result here:
To reproduce the issue, you can use the attached Fasta file along with the ligand structure provided in either the regular aromatic SMILES format or the kekule format (explicit double bonds). I have tried both, but the results remain the same in both cases. The input and output files are included in the attached zip file for your convenience: boltz_aromaticity.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the model (similarly to AlphaFold3) does not take as input information about whether the bonds are single/double/aromatic so changing the input is not indeed supposed to change the output.
We are experimenting with different ways of fine-tuning the model to solve some of these issues and will share improvements as soon as we find them!
Currently, the model (similarly to AlphaFold3) does not take as input information about whether the bonds are single/double/aromatic so changing the input is not indeed supposed to change the output.
We are experimenting with different ways of fine-tuning the model to solve some of these issues and will share improvements as soon as we find them!
Thanks a lot for the clarification! Looking forward to seeing the future improvements and evolution of this exciting project!
I have encountered a problem with the way the software interprets the structure of a bicyclic molecule, leading to incorrect results in the output. Specifically, the molecule in question consists of a bicyclic structure where only one of the rings is aromatic. However, during processing, both rings are incorrectly interpreted as aromatic. Additionally, the non-aromatic ring is also treated as planar, which is not chemically accurate and affects downstream results when working with this ligand in complex with a protein.
For example, consider the structure of the input molecule shown below:
When this ligand is processed with the protein, the output structure incorrectly identifies both rings as aromatic and planar. You can see my result here:
To reproduce the issue, you can use the attached Fasta file along with the ligand structure provided in either the regular aromatic SMILES format or the kekule format (explicit double bonds). I have tried both, but the results remain the same in both cases. The input and output files are included in the attached zip file for your convenience: boltz_aromaticity.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: