Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First quick analysis of the IFC model before asking the user to validate how properties are converted #54

Open
maximelefrancois86 opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@maximelefrancois86
Copy link
Collaborator

maximelefrancois86 commented Jun 15, 2023

It could be relevant to ask the users which properties need to be converted for each type of entity, and how they will be converted to RDF.

Documented as part of Isaac Fatokun, Arun Raveendran Nair, Thamer Mecharnia, Maxime Lefrançois, Victor Charpenay, Fabien Badeig and Antoine Zimmermann, (2023) "Modular Knowledge integration for Smart Building Digital Twins", LDAC 2023

Section 5.1, item 3_transformObjects.py.

Describe the solution you'd like

For each type of entity that will be converted to RDF, the tool could display the existing set of properties, and the RDF predicate that will be used to transform that property into RDF. The user could change this RDF predicate if they wish.

Additional context

For example for the use case described in the paper above, We use the following set of SPARQL queries to transform the objects:

https://github.com/maximelefrancois86/databat-kgc-revit/blob/main/scripts/3_transformObjects.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant