Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extended Data #1

Open
MMCXXVI opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Extended Data #1

MMCXXVI opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@MMCXXVI
Copy link

MMCXXVI commented Mar 29, 2023

Good day!

In your paper, you compared the impact of DeepNeo-MHC, NetMHCpan, and MixMHCpred on MHC binding prediction using different extended data collected from multiple publications, as shown in Figure 1 c and d.

However, I noticed that I couldn't find any annotations or download links for these extended data in the Supplementary information of your paper, the webserver page, or this repository, because it is too trivial to share, or did I miss it somewhere?

Thank you a lot.

Cheers,
guangfu xue

@malachig
Copy link

In the DeepNEO paper:

Code availability
Codes for implementing prediction of peptide-MHC binding and prediction of immunogenicity are deposited at https://github.com/kaistomics/DeepNeo.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01273-y

The authors have publicly attested that they will share this code. And it did indeed exist at this location previously, but has apparently now been removed.

@MMCXXVI
Copy link
Author

MMCXXVI commented May 17, 2023

In the DeepNEO paper:

Code availability
Codes for implementing prediction of peptide-MHC binding and prediction of immunogenicity are deposited at https://github.com/kaistomics/DeepNeo.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01273-y

The authors have publicly attested that they will share this code. And it did indeed exist at this location previously, but has apparently now been removed.

Indeed, two months ago, this GitHub repository contained the relevant model code but lacked the dataset files. However, at present, the repository has been completely emptied, with even the associated code being deleted. If other researchers are unable to reproduce this work, coupled with the fact that the repository was cleared by the author, there are legitimate reasons to question the validity of this research.

@MMCXXVI MMCXXVI closed this as completed May 17, 2023
@MMCXXVI MMCXXVI reopened this May 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants