Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

should we use GaloisFields? #8

Open
kalmarek opened this issue Aug 8, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

should we use GaloisFields? #8

kalmarek opened this issue Aug 8, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@kalmarek
Copy link
Owner

kalmarek commented Aug 8, 2020

https://github.com/tkluck/GaloisFields.jl
@tweisser
Copy link
Collaborator

tweisser commented Aug 8, 2020

The package looks reasonable to me, but do we really need it? Is there a situation, where we would need to use F_q with q= p^n?

@kalmarek
Copy link
Owner Author

kalmarek commented Aug 8, 2020

It's an open question; If we're fine maintaining our GF{p}, there's no need to do switch. Frankly speaking I learned about it only during JuliaCon

blegat pushed a commit to blegat/SymbolicWedderburn.jl that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2021
@kalmarek
Merge pull request kalmarek#8 from kalmarek/enh/complex_arithm
43578b0 
Enh/complex arithm
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kalmarek @tweisser