You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, one possible upgrade that would help a lot is calculating the annotationWinMb across chromosomes. For example, a SNP label at the end of one chromosome and the beginning of the next will often overlap. These labels are super small and fully upright and still we have some interference:
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
The annotationWinMb parameter is not for separating the snp labels, it is for picking the top snp from a specified interval. This option is provided because the user might assume there will be LD for a distance of 1 megabase, for example, and so representing the top snp as a representative is enough. This is similar to the LD window width parameters that Plink and other software use, e.g. for LD pruning. So this parameter is not calculated but user-provided.
If the user asks for annotating many snps, in the extreme case, then there is no way to show a lot of text labels and maintain their correspondence with the points. An extreme example of this is the figure below, shown in the vignette, where we annotate all snps above a p-value threshold. https://github.com/kaustubhad/fastman/blob/main/plots/md8.png
So we do not try to reposition labels to avoid each other.
Hi, one possible upgrade that would help a lot is calculating the annotationWinMb across chromosomes. For example, a SNP label at the end of one chromosome and the beginning of the next will often overlap. These labels are super small and fully upright and still we have some interference:
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: