-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unify way to address configuration on backend #165
Comments
@blcham
to this:
|
yes we should refactor everywhere. |
kostobog
added a commit
to kbss-cvut/fta-fmea-ui
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
…y in docker-compose.yml
kostobog
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
This was referenced Nov 7, 2024
@blcham |
blcham
added a commit
to kbss-cvut/record-manager
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
blcham
added a commit
to kbss-cvut/record-manager-ui
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
blcham
added a commit
to kbss-cvut/record-manager-ui
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
…-compose (part 2)
This was referenced Nov 7, 2024
blcham
added a commit
to kbss-cvut/record-manager
that referenced
this issue
Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As a developer, I would like to see configuration in application.properties unified, I see the following:
From this fast look, I would unify it in the following way:
In case rolePrefix is specific only for
oidc
, I would even move it tosecurity.oidc.rolePrefix: ff-
.A/C:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: