-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do Cesil's Options provide everything needed in a CSV library? #10
Comments
Pretty sure our codebase outputs a file using double-pipes |
@fjmorel iiiinteresting - the thought had crossed my mind but I couldn't dig up a concrete example. Is it possible for you to share more details (like, the subject matter or third party, really anything to contribute to grounding the use case)? |
Hmm, I could have sworn we had something like this, but am not finding it anymore. We definitely have
|
btw, the |
Ah, thanks for pointing that out - I've fixed the links in the issue. That's a pretty concrete example, a second thanks for sharing it. I'll proof out making |
…character value separators per #10 (comment); still leaves read changes to be made; test coverage will need to be expanded to cover new cases as well
The full change is ready in #12 now. |
squashes 19 commits; implements read and write support for multi-character value separators per #10 (comment)
This was posed in Overthinking CSV With Cesil: CSV Isn’t A Thing.
Essentially, are the configurations exposed via
Options
adequate?This was restated as:
in Overthinking CSV With Cesil: “Maximum” Flexibility
This is an Open Question, which means:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: