test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts #132

Ratnesh2003 · 2024-02-09T22:50:41Z

User description

Description

Add failing tests in the util.spec.ts file to fail:

decrypt and encrypt
excludeFields

Fixes #65

Developer's checklist

My PR follows the style guidelines of this project
I have performed a self-check on my work

If changes are made in the code:

I have followed the coding guidelines
My changes in code generate no new warnings
My changes are breaking another fix/feature of the project
I have added test cases to show that my feature works
I have added relevant screenshots in my PR
There are no UI/UX issues

Documentation Update

This PR requires an update to the documentation at docs.keyshade.xyz
I have made the necessary updates to the documentation, or no documentation changes are required.

Type

tests

Description

Added a failing test for encryption and decryption to simulate a scenario where the decrypted text does not match an intentionally modified text.
Introduced a failing test for field exclusion to simulate a scenario where excluded fields are explicitly set, contradicting the exclusion logic.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Tests

util.spec.ts `Add Failing Tests for Encryption/Decryption and Field Exclusion` apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts Added a test to ensure encryption and decryption failure with modified text. Added a test to ensure failure when trying to exclude fields but explicitly setting them afterwards.	+29/-9

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]` meaning the `describe` tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description. Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]` the tool will replace every marker of the form `pr_agent:marker_name` in the PR description with the relevant content, where `marker_name` is one of the following: `type`: the PR type. `summary`: the PR summary. `walkthrough`: the PR walkthrough. Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.
Custom labels The default labels of the `describe` tool are quite generic: [`Bug fix`, `Tests`, `Enhancement`, `Documentation`, `Other`]. If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases. Examples for custom labels: `Main topic:performance` - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance `New endpoint` - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR `SQL query` - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR `Dockerfile changes` - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile ... The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases. Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories. Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.
Inline File Walkthrough 💎 For enhanced user experience, the `describe` tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page. This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs). To enable inline file summary, set `pr_description.inline_file_summary` in the configuration file, possible values are: `'table'`: File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab. `true`: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR. `false` (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.
Utilizing extra instructions The `describe` tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_description] extra_instructions=""" - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>' - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words) - ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-09T22:51:00Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (2cefb93)

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-09T22:51:12Z

PR Review

PR feedback
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the PR is focused on adding specific failing tests which are straightforward to review. The changes are localized to a single file and involve standard testing practices.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	The addition of failing tests for encryption/decryption and field exclusion might be intentional for demonstrating certain behaviors or testing error handling. However, it's important to ensure these tests align with the project's testing strategy and do not inadvertently signal false negatives in CI/CD pipelines. The test 'should fail to exclude fields' modifies the 'excluded' object after calling 'excludeFields', which might not accurately test the functionality of 'excludeFields' but rather tests the mutability of the object. Consider revising the test to focus on the behavior of 'excludeFields' itself.
🔒 Security concerns	No

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the `review` tool is: `pr_commands = ["/review", ...]` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible security issues (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs By invoking: `/review auto_approve` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: `[pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: `[pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5`
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

nx-cloud · 2024-02-09T22:51:20Z

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 9ec27e6. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

✅ Successfully ran 4 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

nx-cloud · 2024-02-09T22:51:21Z

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 2cefb93. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

✅ Successfully ran 1 target

nx run web:lint

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-09T22:51:42Z

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

maintainability

Rename variable for consistency. Consider renaming `plainText` to `plaintext` for consistency with other variable naming conventions in the codebase. apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts [31] -const plainText = 'hello world' +const plaintext = 'hello world'

enhancement

Rename test for clarity. The test 'should fail to encrypt and decrypt a string' might be misleading because it actually tests for successful non-equality. Consider renaming it to reflect its purpose more accurately, such as 'should not decrypt to a modified string'. apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts [29] -it('should fail to encrypt and decrypt a string', () => { +it('should not decrypt to a modified string', () => {

possible issue

Correct expectation to match method purpose. In the test 'should exclude fields', the expectation to have `isActive` as `undefined` contradicts the method's purpose. Consider expecting the property to be absent instead of explicitly undefined. apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts [51-53] -expect(excluded).toEqual({ - ...object, - isActive: undefined -}) +const expectedObject = { ...object } +delete expectedObject.isActive +expect(excluded).toEqual(expectedObject)
Remove or rework misleading test. The test 'should fail to exclude fields' is misleading because it manually sets the excluded field back, which does not reflect typical usage or the function's intent. Consider removing or reworking this test to avoid confusion. apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts [57-64] -it ('should fail to exclude fields', () => { - const excluded = excludeFields(object, 'isActive') - excluded.isActive = true - expect(excluded).toHaveProperty('isActive') - expect(excluded).toEqual({ - ...object, - isActive: true - }) -}) +// Consider removing or reworking this test

best practice

Improve test isolation by localizing the object definition.

The object variable is globally defined for multiple tests, which can lead to unintended
side effects if tests are modified to change the object. Consider moving the object
definition inside each test or using a beforeEach hook for test isolation.

apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts [38-46]

-const object = {
-  id: '1',
-  name: 'John Doe',
-  email: '[email protected]',
-  profilePictureUrl: 'https://keyshade.xyz/johndoe.jpg',
-  isActive: true,
-  isOnboardingFinished: false,
-  isAdmin: false
-}
+beforeEach(() => {
+  const object = {
+    id: '1',
+    name: 'John Doe',
+    email: '[email protected]',
+    profilePictureUrl: 'https://keyshade.xyz/johndoe.jpg',
+    isActive: true,
+    isOnboardingFinished: false,
+    isAdmin: false
+  }
+})

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: `pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codecov · 2024-02-09T22:53:09Z

Codecov Report

Attention: 158 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ae73e7a) 31.22% compared to head (55497fd) 51.84%.
Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Current head 55497fd differs from pull request most recent head 9ec27e6. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9ec27e6 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
apps/api/src/common/create-event.ts	43.33%	34 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/event/service/event.service.ts	26.47%	25 Missing ⚠️
...pps/api/src/workspace/service/workspace.service.ts	4.00%	24 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/secret/service/secret.service.ts	13.63%	19 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/auth/guard/auth/auth.guard.ts	65.78%	13 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/common/get-secret-with-authority.ts	26.66%	11 Missing ⚠️
...api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts	18.18%	9 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/event/controller/event.controller.ts	64.28%	5 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/project/service/project.service.ts	20.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
apps/api/src/auth/controller/auth.controller.ts	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 5 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop     #132       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    31.22%   51.84%   +20.61%     
============================================
  Files           54       75       +21     
  Lines         1156     1516      +360     
  Branches       210      267       +57     
============================================
+ Hits           361      786      +425     
+ Misses         795      730       -65

Flag	Coverage Δ
api-e2e-tests	`51.84% <53.93%> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts

sonarqubecloud · 2024-02-10T18:56:33Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

rajdip-b · 2024-02-12T19:19:28Z

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts

2cefb93

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the Tests label Feb 9, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 2 label Feb 9, 2024

rajdip-b requested changes Feb 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

apps/api/src/common/util.spec.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts

55497fd

rajdip-b approved these changes Feb 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'develop' into test/add-failing-tests

9ec27e6

rajdip-b merged commit 6889c4d into keyshade-xyz:develop Feb 10, 2024
8 checks passed

rajdip-b added the released label Feb 12, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts #132

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts #132

Ratnesh2003 commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 10, 2024

rajdip-b commented Feb 12, 2024

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts #132

test: Add failing tests in util.spec.ts #132

Conversation

Ratnesh2003 commented Feb 9, 2024 • edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot Loading

User description

Description

Developer's checklist

Documentation Update

Type

Description

Changes walkthrough

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

PR Review

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024 • edited Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 9, 2024

PR Code Suggestions

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 10, 2024

Quality Gate passed

rajdip-b commented Feb 12, 2024

Ratnesh2003 commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot

Loading

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading