Integrate VC Data Model Spec Test Suite Into SSI

[LuisOsta]

Should incorporate into GHA for automated testing, along with DIDs

[LuisOsta]

Link to our fork - https://github.com/knox-networks/vc-test-suite

[LuisOsta]

I've filed w3c/vc-test-suite#135 to deal with the proof-related issues we were having due to us expecting certain properties to be part of any proof object. As a temporary solution I've copied the proof in example 5 to examples 1-4. This doesn't result in a logical change of what the examples are meant to test as far as I know

[LuisOsta]

When you exclude the features, we don't support yet we've got 6 failures currently I've attached the report below

KnoxNetworks-report.json

[LuisOsta]

One spec test remains failing and its the one that requires the verifiableCredential field to be optional, which to me is weird in concept but there's more information here - w3c/vc-test-suite#113. Should we file an issue with the VC spec to clarify the language?

[LuisOsta]

Here's an updated report

KnoxNetworks-report.json

[LuisOsta]

I've fixed the last issue, the verifiableCredential issue is completely correct. Here's a link to the 1.1 spec - https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/#presentations-0. What remains is the proof-related issues - w3c/vc-test-suite#135

[LuisOsta]

Our repo - https://github.com/knox-networks/vc-test-suite has updated the examples to not be malformed and added the Knox Networks report

[fkim7]

Thanks- updated results can be found here https://knox-networks.github.io/vc-test-suite/implementations/

some comments
2.3 Credential Status - why do we show no support?
Credential Schema- I think we should be able to address this in the upcoming sprints as we add VC schema
ZKP- Would be interesting to see how the other providers with support passed the tests.

[fkim7]

[fkim7]

results here https://knox-networks.github.io/vc-test-suite/implementations/