-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stability Initiative #726
Comments
We've accomplished the main overarching thing we wanted to achieve to at least mark us stable w.r.t. the client stability doc: So will close this as I'm tired of having this massive issue around (not a huge fan of the ergonomics of umbrella issues after having tried them). There are three minor points that did not make it and will need some clarity/improvements in the future, but they have their own issues:
|
We plan to provide a series of stability guarantees, policies, and a stable governance via CNCF, for kube-rs going forward.
This is an umbrella issue tracking progress and major outstanding work before we mark ourselves as stable. It pertains to the
Stability
category on the roadmap.Background
This is part of a set of stable client requirements plus extra requirements that we would like to provide on top so that users can feel safe choosing
kube-rs
as a reliable set of libraries to build upon kubernetes.There's been a lot of introductory work in this area already as part of our
in-progressCNCF setup (#584), along with stability work in #508 (which this issue replaces).A lot of this is document pertains to process/policy writing that needs to be argued for/against, and then their subsequent implementations and enforcement of these proposed processes through continuous integration.
Tasks
Community & Governance
Policies & Clarity:
#[deny(missing_docs)]
at root of repos#[allow(missing_docs)]
overrides - purge last missing_docs allows + fix docs errors #728doctest readme- doc = include_str! readme #736try_flatten_applied
) - Policies for stability website#18Security:
cargo deny
multiple-versions - cargo deny mutliple-fields ban #711cargo deny
unknown git sources - deny.toml stricten unknown sources + bump tokio for rustsec issue #727cargo deny
strict licenses and rustsec vulnerabilities - Add cargo-deny, clippy and rustfmt to CI - try #2 #611kube
as a super-crate facade - kube super-crate #651re-export generated structs from? - maybe post k8s-pbkube
#[forbid(unsafe_code)]
forcargo-geiger
🔒 - deny(unsafe_code) -> forbid(unsafe_code) #734Continuous Integration:
extend e2e test matrix job to be able to run on both k3d and extra cluster- we would need one firstuse cloud clusters to point to in CI?(maybe sponsored or / cncf service / cncf community)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: