-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Controller should be optional #281
Comments
That's a valid issue. The controller is needed to create volumes that then can be used during the node operations. Another approach for specifying valid volumes will be needed when testing without controller. Patches welcome... |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I would like to re-open this issue. We also have a case when we don't really use controller service. |
/reopen |
@pohly: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
According to the CSI spec, the controller is actually optional. I would like a way to run the tests without assuming the controller exists. Only the NodeServer and IdentityServer are present in my OCI plugin.
From the spec
I tried adding
-ginkgo.focus Node
but there are still tests that fail due to calling controller RPCs such as• Failure [0.002 seconds] Node Service /code/oss/csi-test/pkg/sanity/tests.go:44 NodeStageVolume /code/oss/csi-test/pkg/sanity/node.go:424 should fail when no volume capability is provided [It] /code/oss/csi-test/pkg/sanity/node.go:475 Unexpected error: <*status.statusError | 0xc000430c30>: { Code: 12, Message: "unknown service csi.v1.Controller", Details: nil, XXX_NoUnkeyedLiteral: {}, XXX_unrecognized: nil, XXX_sizecache: 0, } rpc error: code = Unimplemented desc = unknown service csi.v1.Controller occurred
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: