Fixing a couple typos

kylelang · Oct 16, 2023 · 7e5d3e3 · 7e5d3e3
1 parent b9525b5
commit 7e5d3e3
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 5 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/at-home-exercises-6.html b/docs/at-home-exercises-6.html
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ <h4><span class="header-section-number">7.3.1.3</span> </h4>
 <ol style="list-style-type: decimal">
 <li>Estimate the unrestricted multiple-group model wherein we regress <code>POSTNUMB</code>
 onto <code>AGE</code> and specify <code>VIEWCAT</code> as the grouping factor.</li>
-<li>Estimate the restricted model wherein we constrain the <code>AGE</code> <span class="math inline">\(rightarrow\)</span>
+<li>Estimate the restricted model wherein we constrain the <code>AGE</code> <span class="math inline">\(\rightarrow\)</span>
 <code>POSTNUMB</code> effect to be equal in all <code>VIEWCAT</code> groups.</li>
 <li>Conduct a <span class="math inline">\(\Delta \chi^2\)</span> test to compare the fit of the two models.</li>
 </ol>
@@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ <h4><span class="header-section-number">7.3.2.5</span> </h4>
 <span class="math inline">\(\textit{RMSEA} = 0.022\)</span>,
 <span class="math inline">\(\textit{CFI} = 0.998\)</span>,
 <span class="math inline">\(\textit{SRMR} = 0.017\)</span>).</p></li>
-<li><p>No, there are no striking differences between the two sets of estimates. Although,
+<li><p>No, there are no striking differences between the two sets of estimates. Although
 there is certainly some variability between groups, the two sets of estimates
 don’t look systematically different.</p>
 </details></li>

diff --git a/docs/search_index.json b/docs/search_index.json
diff --git a/docs/willy_wallaby_from_wasatch_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-132-1.png b/docs/willy_wallaby_from_wasatch_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-132-1.png
diff --git a/docs/willy_wallaby_from_wasatch_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-134-1.png b/docs/willy_wallaby_from_wasatch_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-134-1.png
diff --git a/sections/week7/home.Rmd b/sections/week7/home.Rmd
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ We will use path analysis to test if `VIEWCAT` moderates the effect of `AGE` on
 
 1.  Estimate the unrestricted multiple-group model wherein we regress `POSTNUMB`
    onto `AGE` and specify `VIEWCAT` as the grouping factor.
-2.  Estimate the restricted model wherein we constrain the `AGE` $rightarrow$
+2.  Estimate the restricted model wherein we constrain the `AGE` $\rightarrow$
    `POSTNUMB` effect to be equal in all `VIEWCAT` groups.
 3.  Conduct a $\Delta \chi^2$ test to compare the fit of the two models.
 
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ $p = `r p`$,
 $\textit{RMSEA} = `r rmsea`$,
 $\textit{CFI} = `r cfi`$,
 $\textit{SRMR} = `r srmr`$).
-- No, there are no striking differences between the two sets of estimates. Although, 
+- No, there are no striking differences between the two sets of estimates. Although
   there is certainly some variability between groups, the two sets of estimates
   don't look systematically different.