diff --git a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.html b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.html
index bb036b9..c83859c 100644
--- a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.html
+++ b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.html
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@
 </tr></thead>
 <tfoot><tr>
 <td class="left">Brockhaus, et al.</td>
-<td class="center">Expires 20 July 2025</td>
+<td class="center">Expires 21 July 2025</td>
 <td class="right">[Page]</td>
 </tr></tfoot>
 </table>
@@ -1089,12 +1089,12 @@
 <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912" class="eref">5912</a> (if approved)</dd>
 <dt class="label-published">Published:</dt>
 <dd class="published">
-<time datetime="2025-01-16" class="published">16 January 2025</time>
+<time datetime="2025-01-17" class="published">17 January 2025</time>
     </dd>
 <dt class="label-intended-status">Intended Status:</dt>
 <dd class="intended-status">Standards Track</dd>
 <dt class="label-expires">Expires:</dt>
-<dd class="expires"><time datetime="2025-07-20">20 July 2025</time></dd>
+<dd class="expires"><time datetime="2025-07-21">21 July 2025</time></dd>
 <dt class="label-authors">Authors:</dt>
 <dd class="authors">
 <div class="author">
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ <h2 id="name-status-of-this-memo">
         time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
         material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-3" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 <p id="section-boilerplate.1-4">
-        This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 July 2025.<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+        This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 July 2025.<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </section>
 </div>
 <div id="copyright">
@@ -4187,7 +4187,7 @@ <h4 id="name-certificate-identification">
           <h4 id="name-out-of-band-trusted-ca-publ">
 <a href="#section-5.2.5" class="section-number selfRef">5.2.5. </a><a href="#name-out-of-band-trusted-ca-publ" class="section-name selfRef">Out-of-band trusted CA Public Key</a>
           </h4>
-<p id="section-5.2.5-1">Each trusted CA that provides its self-signed certificate must be able to publish its current public key via some
+<p id="section-5.2.5-1">Each trusted CA that provides a self-signed certificate must be able to publish its current public key via some
 "out-of-band" means or together with the respective link certificate using an online mechanism.  While such mechanisms are beyond the scope of
 this document, we define data structures that can support such
 mechanisms.<a href="#section-5.2.5-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
@@ -7541,7 +7541,7 @@ <h3 id="name-self-signed-certificates">
 "sensible" values for all fields.  For example, when present,
 subjectAltName <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> be identical to issuerAltName, and, when present,
 keyIdentifiers must contain appropriate values, et cetera.<a href="#appendix-D.3-3" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
-<p id="appendix-D.3-4">Note that the newWithNew and oldWithOld certificates not necessarily refer to self-signed certificate, but more generally to trusted CA certificates.<a href="#appendix-D.3-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+<p id="appendix-D.3-4">Note that in general newWithNew and oldWithOld certificates not necessarily refer to self-signed certificate, but to trusted CA certificates as defined in <a href="#sect-3.1.1.2" class="auto internal xref">Section 3.1.1.2</a>.<a href="#appendix-D.3-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </section>
 </div>
 <div id="sect-d.4">
diff --git a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.txt b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.txt
index 874f244..405d8cb 100644
--- a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.txt
+++ b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis.txt
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ Internet-Draft                                             D. von Oheimb
 Obsoletes: 4210 9480 (if approved)                               Siemens
 Updates: 5912 (if approved)                                 M. Ounsworth
 Intended status: Standards Track                                 J. Gray
-Expires: 20 July 2025                                            Entrust
-                                                         16 January 2025
+Expires: 21 July 2025                                            Entrust
+                                                         17 January 2025
 
 
    Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Certificate Management
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Status of This Memo
    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 
-   This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 July 2025.
+   This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 July 2025.
 
 Copyright Notice
 
@@ -2315,9 +2315,9 @@ Table of Contents
 
 5.2.5.  Out-of-band trusted CA Public Key
 
-   Each trusted CA that provides its self-signed certificate must be
-   able to publish its current public key via some "out-of-band" means
-   or together with the respective link certificate using an online
+   Each trusted CA that provides a self-signed certificate must be able
+   to publish its current public key via some "out-of-band" means or
+   together with the respective link certificate using an online
    mechanism.  While such mechanisms are beyond the scope of this
    document, we define data structures that can support such mechanisms.
 
@@ -5062,9 +5062,9 @@ D.3.  Self-Signed Certificates
    subjectAltName MUST be identical to issuerAltName, and, when present,
    keyIdentifiers must contain appropriate values, et cetera.
 
-   Note that the newWithNew and oldWithOld certificates not necessarily
-   refer to self-signed certificate, but more generally to trusted CA
-   certificates.
+   Note that in general newWithNew and oldWithOld certificates not
+   necessarily refer to self-signed certificate, but to trusted CA
+   certificates as defined in Section 3.1.1.2.
 
 D.4.  Trusted CA Key Update
 
diff --git a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.html b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.html
index c7f7f53..a90233f 100644
--- a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.html
+++ b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.html
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@
 </tr></thead>
 <tfoot><tr>
 <td class="left">Brockhaus, et al.</td>
-<td class="center">Expires 20 July 2025</td>
+<td class="center">Expires 21 July 2025</td>
 <td class="right">[Page]</td>
 </tr></tfoot>
 </table>
@@ -1075,12 +1075,12 @@
 <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6712%209480" class="eref">6712 9480</a> (if approved)</dd>
 <dt class="label-published">Published:</dt>
 <dd class="published">
-<time datetime="2025-01-16" class="published">16 January 2025</time>
+<time datetime="2025-01-17" class="published">17 January 2025</time>
     </dd>
 <dt class="label-intended-status">Intended Status:</dt>
 <dd class="intended-status">Standards Track</dd>
 <dt class="label-expires">Expires:</dt>
-<dd class="expires"><time datetime="2025-07-20">20 July 2025</time></dd>
+<dd class="expires"><time datetime="2025-07-21">21 July 2025</time></dd>
 <dt class="label-authors">Authors:</dt>
 <dd class="authors">
 <div class="author">
@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ <h2 id="name-status-of-this-memo">
         time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
         material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-3" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 <p id="section-boilerplate.1-4">
-        This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 July 2025.<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+        This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 July 2025.<a href="#section-boilerplate.1-4" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </section>
 </div>
 <div id="copyright">
diff --git a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.txt b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.txt
index 0983d73..23c55b7 100644
--- a/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.txt
+++ b/remove_root-CA_terminology/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.txt
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ LAMPS Working Group                                         H. Brockhaus
 Internet-Draft                                             D. von Oheimb
 Obsoletes: 6712 9480 (if approved)                               Siemens
 Intended status: Standards Track                            M. Ounsworth
-Expires: 20 July 2025                                            J. Gray
+Expires: 21 July 2025                                            J. Gray
                                                                  Entrust
-                                                         16 January 2025
+                                                         17 January 2025
 
 
    Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- HTTP Transfer for the
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Status of This Memo
    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 
-   This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 July 2025.
+   This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 July 2025.
 
 Copyright Notice