-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem with eio_clean_thr process #54
Comments
Please note that when eio is locked IO can be issued directly in both source and cache devices. |
I just compiled and installed master version in kernel 4.14.158. I still face the same bug in this kernel. |
Master version flushes cache without any problem in kernel 3.10.0. But it takes too long to fill the cache (compared to kernel 4.14) with the same sequential write workload. |
I tested the master version on kernel 5.4.2 and the flush process works correctly. |
Hi,
I compiled and installed master version in kernel 4.14.34.
When writing sequentially into the disk, the cache device gets full and cannot evict data from the cache.
eio_clean_thr sticks in D state and the eviction (flushing/cleaning) process cannot continue even after stopping IO (sequential write).
This is the stack trace of the process:
eio_clean_thr D 0 28023 2 0x80000080
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: Call Trace:
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? __schedule+0x1ad/0x6a0
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: schedule+0x32/0x80
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: rwsem_down_write_failed+0x1fe/0x380
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: down_write+0x29/0x40
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: eio_clean_set+0x14c/0x9f0 [enhanceio]
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? del_timer_sync+0x35/0x40
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? call_timer_fn+0x130/0x130
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: eio_clean_thread_proc+0x1bc/0x360 [enhanceio]
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? __schedule+0x1b5/0x6a0
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: kthread+0xfc/0x130
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? eio_clean_all+0xd0/0xd0 [enhanceio]
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ? __kthread_parkme+0x70/0x70
Dec 7 12:08:46 srv01 kernel: ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Thanks,
Saba
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: