Documentation of Langchain with Javascript is not good at all

[yours7himanshu]

@akira @nfcampos
Facing issue on passing the Grok api key and langchain api key here is the code i had wrote but its showing invalid api key eventhough i passed it correctly...check the code attached with the screenshot-

[hinthornw]

Hi @yours7himanshu , what are you looking to accomplish?

The langchain api key isn't somethign ChatGroq expects.

To activate tracing you'd set both LANGCHAIN_API_KEY (or LANGSMITH_API_KEY) and LANGSMITH_TRACING=true in your environment, but your code doesn't have to be aware of that

[yours7himanshu]

@hinthornw i had removed that too but still don't know i am getting this warning and and error with invalid api key don't know why even though in my opinion i am doing correctly i had used .env file to store api keys and using it.
Error i am getting-
[DEP0040] DeprecationWarning: The punycode module is deprecated. Please use a userland alternative instead.
(Use node --trace-deprecation ... to show where the warning was created)
file:///C:/Users/dinka/Documents/LangChain/node_modules/groq-sdk/error.mjs:39
return new AuthenticationError(status, error, message, headers);
^

AuthenticationError: 401 {"error":{"message":"Invalid API Key","type":"invalid_request_error","code":"invalid_api_key"}}
at APIError.generate (file:///C:/Users/dinka/Documents/LangChain/node_modules/groq-sdk/error.mjs:39:20)
at Groq.makeStatusError (file:///C:/Users/dinka/Documents/LangChain/node_modules/groq-sdk/core.mjs:268:25)
at Groq.makeRequest (file:///C:/Users/dinka/Documents/LangChain/node_modules/groq-sdk/core.mjs:311:30)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)
at async RetryOperation._fn (C:\Users\dinka\Documents\LangChain\node_modules\p-retry\index.js:50:12) {
status: 401,
headers: {
'alt-svc': 'h3=":443"; ma=86400',
'cache-control': 'private, max-age=0, no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate',
'cf-cache-status': 'DYNAMIC',
'cf-ray': '8ec99310bdd97fe9-MAA',
connection: 'keep-alive',
'content-length': '96',
'content-type': 'application/json',
date: 'Wed, 04 Dec 2024 06:00:09 GMT',
server: 'cloudflare',
'set-cookie': '__cf_bm=HLiCJzsEGAJ.Ek3hUyHMz39rCRkb3LCS2PmtRukXXuI-1733292009-1.0.1.1-v1ri.qFuAqahDYRj6DHyFr89pUgZxM5tm8rCY6Cytmg7VElplbnGlMIzObRd7UN1V7Lx8uUv82ooNw1FTsFIZg; path=/; expires=Wed, 04-Dec-24 06:30:09 GMT; domain=.groq.com; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None',
vary: 'Origin',
via: '1.1 google',
'x-request-id': 'req_01je8429rcfqa87khvkd6vqbqb'
},
error: {
error: {
message: 'Invalid API Key',
type: 'invalid_request_error',
code: 'invalid_api_key'
}
},
attemptNumber: 1,
retriesLeft: 6
}

Attached sreenshot-

[hinthornw]

And is the API key correct?

[yours7himanshu]

Yes it's 100% correct

…

On Fri, Dec 6, 2024, 5:36 AM William FH ***@***.***> wrote: And is the API key correct? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#562 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2TEW6GXE5Z2MCDSSMAIPKD2EDS7BAVCNFSM6AAAAABS6UQXYWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMRRG43DMMRUHA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>