feat: IPRPC over IBC #1446
feat: IPRPC over IBC #1446
Conversation
x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go
Outdated
|
|
||
| if iprpcData, ok := transferMemo["iprpc"].(map[string]interface{}); ok { | ||
| // verify creator field | ||
| creator, ok := iprpcData["creator"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
use the codec to unmarshall the memo instead of looking for every item in it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
done. see 6a3ccb7
x/rewards/types/iprpc.go
Outdated
| @@ -13,3 +13,13 @@ const ( | |||
| // IprpcRewardsCurrentPrefix is the prefix to retrieve all IprpcRewardsCurrent | |||
| IprpcRewardsCurrentPrefix = "IprpcRewardsCurrent/" | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| type IprpcMemo struct { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this should be defined in a proto buff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
done. see 1723bb7
oren-lava
changed the title
WalkthroughThese changes introduce extensive support for handling Interchain Public Research and Proposal Committee (IPRPC) over Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC), primarily extending the rewards module. The updates include implementing new IBC middleware methods, modifying genesis and keeper logics, adding CLI commands, and updating proto files to support fund management, validation, and transactions for IPRPC-related operations over IBC. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant RewardsModule
participant Keeper
User->>CLI: Submit IBC Transfer Tx
CLI->>RewardsModule: Process Packet
RewardsModule->>Keeper: Validate and Fund IPRPC
Keeper->>RewardsModule: Fund Validation Result
RewardsModule->>CLI: Acknowledgement Packet
CLI->>User: Transaction Result
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (1)
69-74: Enhance logging for better traceability.The function
printInvalidMemoWarninglogs warnings but could be improved by including more context about the error, such as the packet ID or transaction hash if available. This would help in tracing issues more effectively in production environments.x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go (1)
Line range hint
49-174: Review integration of ICS4 wrapper in the Keeper struct.The integration of the
ics4Wrapperinto theKeeperstruct allows the rewards module to function as an IBC middleware. However, ensure that all methods ofics4Wrapperare correctly implemented and that there are no missing functionalities or error handling mechanisms that could affect the module's stability.testutil/keeper/keepers_init.go (1)
Line range hint
1-267: Add detailed comments inInitAllKeepersto explain the setup process and interactions between components.
- Document the purpose of each block of code, especially where keepers are initialized and parameters are set.
- Explain the relationships and dependencies between different keepers and modules.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
x/rewards/types/iprpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (12)
- app/app.go (2 hunks)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/iprpc.proto (1 hunks)
- testutil/keeper/keepers_init.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/keeper/rewards.go (1 hunks)
- testutil/sample/sample.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go (6 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/iprpc.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- testutil/keeper/keepers_init.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
Additional comments not posted (12)
x/rewards/types/errors.go (3)
11-11: The error variableErrFundIprpcis well-defined and relevant for handling IPRPC transaction failures.
12-12: The errorErrMemoNotIprpcOverIbccorrectly handles cases where the IBC-transfer packet's memo does not follow the expected IPRPC over IBC format.
13-13: The errorErrIprpcMemoInvalidis appropriately used for handling invalid memo content in IBC-transfer packets, ensuring robust validation.x/rewards/types/iprpc.go (1)
17-19: TheIsEqualmethod correctly compares all relevant fields ofIprpcMemo. Consider adding a comment about the efficiency of string comparisons and potential optimization strategies.proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/iprpc.proto (1)
22-25: TheIprpcMemomessage is well-defined with clear field descriptions and appropriate data types, aligning with the requirements for IPRPC over IBC functionality.testutil/sample/sample.go (1)
16-21: TheAccAddressObjectfunction correctly generates a sample account address using theed25519key generation, which is standard in the Cosmos SDK. This function is useful for creating realistic test environments.testutil/keeper/rewards.go (1)
97-97: Clarify the purpose of thenilargument.The
nilargument in theNewKeeperfunction call at line 97 is unclear. Please verify its purpose and ensure it is intended, as it might be a placeholder or an error.Verification successful
The
nilargument in theNewKeeperfunction call at line 97 oftestutil/keeper/rewards.gois likely a placeholder for an optional dependency or a feature that is not being used in the test setup. To confirm this, we need to examine theNewKeeperfunction definition inx/rewards/keeper/keeper.go.
The
NewKeeperfunction inx/rewards/keeper/keeper.gohas a parameterics4Wrapperof typeporttypes.ICS4Wrapper, which is the 15th parameter in the function signature. Thenilargument in thetestutil/keeper/rewards.gofile corresponds to this parameter.Given that
ics4Wrapperis an optional dependency for theNewKeeperfunction, passingnilis acceptable if the functionality provided byics4Wrapperis not required in the test setup.
x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go:70:ics4Wrapper porttypes.ICS4WrapperThis confirms that the
nilargument is intentional and serves as a placeholder for theics4Wrapperdependency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of `NewKeeper` to verify the purpose of the `nil` argument. rg --type go 'NewKeeper' --context 5Length of output: 35449
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of the `NewKeeper` function in `x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewKeeper($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) $_' x/rewards/keeper/keeper.goLength of output: 3420
x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1)
11-177: Comprehensive test coverage for memo parsing.The test function
TestParseIprpcOverIbcMemocovers a wide range of scenarios for memo parsing, ensuring robust testing of the memo validation logic. Good job on covering edge cases and error conditions.x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (2)
142-149: This delegation to the underlying application'sOnAcknowledgementPacketis implemented correctly.
151-157: Correct implementation of delegation inOnTimeoutPacket.app/app.go (2)
562-562: Integration ofIBCKeeper.ChannelKeeperintoRewardsKeeper.This change is crucial for enabling the rewards module to function as IBC middleware, allowing it to interact with IBC channels directly. Ensure that the
ChannelKeeperis properly initialized before this integration to avoid nil pointer dereferences.
718-718: Addition ofrewardsmodule.NewIBCMiddlewareto the IBC router.This is a key integration point for the rewards module to function as IBC middleware. It wraps the existing
transferStackwith the rewards middleware, enabling the rewards module to intercept and process IBC packets. Ensure that the middleware is correctly handling the packet forwarding and acknowledgements as expected in the IBC protocol.
| // the packet is transferred normally to the next IBC module in the transfer stack | ||
| func (im IBCMiddleware) OnRecvPacket(ctx sdk.Context, packet channeltypes.Packet, relayer sdk.AccAddress) exported.Acknowledgement { | ||
| // unmarshal the packet's data with the transfer module codec (expect an ibc-transfer packet) | ||
| var data transfertypes.FungibleTokenPacketData |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is breaking other functionality of ibc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's not because the middleware is only registered under the ibc-transfer stack (see app/app.go lines 711-720). For this reason, the packet must by of type FungibleTokenPacketData. Instead of returning an error I can call the Transfer keeper's OnRecvPacket and it'll return the error (in case the data is not FungibleTokenPacketData). Is it preferable?
| // on the IBC transfer module's side (which returns a non-nil ack when executed without errors). Asynchronous | ||
| // processing can be queued processing of packets, interacting with external APIs and more. These can cause | ||
| // delays in the IBC-transfer's processing which will make the module return a nil ack until the processing is done. | ||
| return ack |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in case of ack == nil and async transfer we have funds left over in the account and no pending fund state writes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
done. see 1676677
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just FYI, after extensive research, the Transfer module itself always return sync acks. Your comment is still correct because we might have in the future an IBC middleware in the transfer stack that could use async acks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc.go (1)
36-45: Consider clarifying the comment onIbcIprpcReceiverAddressto explicitly state why a module address is used even though it is not a module account. This might help prevent potential confusion.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- app/app.go (3 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query_pools.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/pool_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc_test.go: Error: Server error. Please try again later.
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/app.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1)
10-29: The test functionTestIprpcMemoIsEqualis well-structured and covers the necessary scenarios for theIsEqualmethod. Good use of table-driven tests.x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query_pools.go (1)
40-43: The addition ofPendingIprpcPoolNameto thePoolsfunction is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives to manage IPRPC funds.x/rewards/keeper/pool_test.go (1)
67-68: The test case forPendingIprpcPoolNameinTestRewardsModuleSetupis correctly testing the initial state of the pool, ensuring it starts empty as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- app/app.go (3 hunks)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/app.go
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: lint
x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go
[failure] 120-120:
Asyncronousis a misspelling ofAsynchronous(misspell)
[failure] 175-175:
functionaliyis a misspelling offunctionally(misspell)
Additional comments not posted (3)
x/rewards/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
64-64: The newFundCommunityPoolmethod allows for funding the community pool directly from theDistributionKeeper. Ensure that this method is utilized correctly elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
The context around the usage of
FundCommunityPoolinx/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.goshows that it is used as a fallback mechanism when transferring funds to the pending IPRPC fund request pool fails. The code includes proper error handling for both the initial transfer and the fallback to the community pool. The sender address is correctly specified astypes.IbcIprpcReceiverAddress().
- The method
FundCommunityPoolis used correctly with proper error handling.- The sender address is appropriately checked and used.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `FundCommunityPool` method across the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling and sender checks before calling this method. rg --type go $'FundCommunityPool'Length of output: 786
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract 10 lines before and after the usage of `FundCommunityPool` in `x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go` to examine the context. rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'FundCommunityPool' x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.goLength of output: 1455
x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (2)
34-50: The memo extraction logic inExtractIprpcMemoFromPacketis robust, thanks to the previous improvements. Ensure that the error handling in lines 40-46 continues to be effective.
52-68: The improvements invalidateIprpcMemohave enhanced readability and maintainability. Continue to ensure that the validation logic is comprehensive and covers all necessary conditions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go
…ver IBC proposal (#1450) * CNS-964: generate ibc transfer tx cli * CNS-964: PR fixes * CNS-964: lint fix * CNS-964: replace generate-ibc-transfer with submit-ibc-transfer * feat: IPRPC over IBC: Part 3 - CNS-965: Pending IPRPC IBC fund (#1452) * CNS-965: scaffold param IbcIprpcExpiration * CNS-965: create pending iprpc fund * CNS-965: fix unit tests * CNS-965: move pending iprpc to seperate files and add IsExpired * CNS-965: renamed to PendingIbcIprpcFund + bug fixes * CNS-965: unit tests * CNS-965: remove expired PendingIbcIprpcFunds in begin block * CNS-965: unit tests * CNS-965: comment * CNS-965: divide fund when creating a new pending ibc iprpc fund * CNS-965: lint fix * CNS-965: fixes * CNS-965: add events * CNS-965: fixes after merge * CNS-965: revert ibc transfer in case of middleware failure * CNS-965: pending iprpc pool + reorder code that ibc-transfer is last in middleware * CNS-965: migrator for IbcIprpcExpiration param * CNS-965: make expired pending iprpc funds be taken from the pending pool * CNS-965: small fixes * feat: IPRPC over IBC: Part 4 - CNS-966: pending ibc iprpc fund query (#1457) * CNS-966: implemented pending ibc iprpc query + unit test * CNS-966: fix help section * feat: IPRPC over IBC: Part 5 - CNS-967: Cover pending IBC IPRPC fund costs (#1470) * CNS-967: implement cover ibc iprpc funds TX * CNS-967: make gov module not pay min cost * CNS-967: unit test * CNS-967: partial merge from CNS-966 * CNS-967: small fixes * feat: IPRPC over IBC: Part 6 - CNS-968: IBC middleware testing (#1481) * CNS-968: add mock transfer keeper and IBC middleware to tester * CNS-968: change middleware success ack and move create iprpc memo to types * CNS-968: create ibc transfer helper func for tests and update tests * CNS-968: lint fix * feat: IPRPC over IBC: Part 7 - CNS-969 update README (#1482) * CNS-969: improve comments * CNS-969: rename param and move event * CNS-969: update README * CNS-969: small comment fix
oren-lava
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 23
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
x/rewards/types/message_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost_test.go (1)
10-42: Consider adding more test cases.The current test cases cover basic validation scenarios. Consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases such as:
- Empty creator address
- Negative index
+ { + name: "empty creator address", + msg: MsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCost{ + Creator: "", + Index: 1, + }, + valid: false, + }, + { + name: "negative index", + msg: MsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCost{ + Creator: sample.AccAddress(), + Index: -1, + }, + valid: false, + },x/rewards/keeper/iprpc_reward.go (1)
Line range hint
75-80:
Consider swapping the order of operations.The function
PopIprpcRewardshould remove the reward after successfully retrieving it to prevent potential issues ifRemoveIprpcRewardfails.- defer k.RemoveIprpcReward(ctx, current) + reward, found := k.GetIprpcReward(ctx, current) + if !found { + return types.IprpcReward{}, false + } + k.RemoveIprpcReward(ctx, current) + return reward, truex/rewards/types/params.go (2)
44-47: Add documentation for the new parameter.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the
KeyIbcIprpcExpirationandDefaultIbcIprpcExpirationvariables.
167-178: Improve error message clarity.Consider providing a more descriptive error message for the
validateDurationfunction.- return fmt.Errorf("invalid duration parameter") + return fmt.Errorf("invalid duration parameter: duration cannot be zero")proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/query.proto (3)
142-145: Clarify the filter field description.The description for the
filterfield in theQueryPendingIbcIprpcFundsRequestmessage should be clarified to specify the expected format or values.- string filter = 1; // can be an uint64 index, creator name and spec name + string filter = 1; // can be an uint64 index, creator name, or spec name
147-150: Add documentation for the new message type.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the
PendingIbcIprpcFundInfomessage type and its fields.
152-155: Add documentation for the new message type.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the
QueryPendingIbcIprpcFundsResponsemessage type and its fields.x/rewards/keeper/iprpc.go (2)
20-22: Clarify the calculation of total funds.The calculation of
totalFundsshould be clarified. It assumes thatdurationis in months, but this should be explicitly mentioned in comments or documentation.+ // Calculate total funds to transfer to the IPRPC pool (input fund is monthly fund, duration is in months) totalFunds := fund.MulInt(math.NewIntFromUint64(duration))
63-69: Ensure proper logging of fund transfer errors.The logging of errors during fund transfers should include all relevant information to aid in debugging.
return utils.LavaFormatError(types.ErrFundIprpc.Error()+"for funding iprpc pool", err, utils.LogAttr("creator", creator), utils.LogAttr("monthly_fund", fund.String()), utils.LogAttr("duration", duration), + utils.LogAttr("total_fund", totalFunds.String()), )x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (2)
82-82: Clarify the memo format in the comment.The comment should specify the expected JSON structure for the memo field to improve readability and understanding.
- // OnRecvPacket checks the packet's memo and funds the IPRPC pool accordingly. If the memo is not the expected JSON, + // OnRecvPacket checks the packet's memo and funds the IPRPC pool accordingly. The expected memo format is: + // { + // "iprpc": { + // "creator": "string", + // "spec": "string", + // "duration": "uint64" + // } + // } + // If the memo is not the expected JSON,
132-139: Clarify the handling of asynchronous acknowledgements.The comment should explicitly state why
ack == nilis treated as a potential issue and how it is handled.- // we check for ack == nil because it means that IBC transfer module did not return an acknowledgement. - // This isn't necessarily an error, but it could indicate unexpected behavior or asynchronous processing - // on the IBC transfer module's side (which returns a non-nil ack when executed without errors). Asynchronous - // processing can be queued processing of packets, interacting with external APIs and more. These can cause - // delays in the IBC-transfer's processing which will make the module return a nil ack until the processing is done. + // We check for ack == nil because it means that the IBC transfer module did not return an acknowledgement. + // This isn't necessarily an error, but it could indicate unexpected behavior or asynchronous processing + // on the IBC transfer module's side. Normally, the module returns a non-nil ack when executed without errors. + // Asynchronous processing can include queued packet processing, interactions with external APIs, and more. + // These can cause delays in the IBC-transfer's processing, resulting in a nil ack until the processing is complete.x/rewards/keeper/iprpc_test.go (14)
34-34: Clarify the comment for invalid amount.The comment mentions "invalid amount = exactly minIprpcCost", but the code indicates that it is valid. Clarify the comment to avoid confusion.
- // - invalid amount = exactly minIprpcCost + // - invalid amount = less than minIprpcCost
Line range hint
41-52: Improve readability by aligning the comments with the corresponding fund data.Align comments with the corresponding fund data for better readability.
fundIprpcTXsData := []fundIprpcData{ {spec: ts.specs[0].Index, duration: 1, fund: sdk.NewCoins(minIprpcCost)}, // invalid {spec: ts.specs[0].Index, duration: 1, fund: sdk.NewCoins( sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), math.NewInt(10+minIprpcCost.Amount.Int64())), )}, // 10ulava, 1 month, mockspec {spec: ts.specs[0].Index, duration: 1, fund: sdk.NewCoins( sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), math.NewInt(minIprpcCost.Amount.Int64())), sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, math.NewInt(50)), )}, // 50uibc, 1 month, mockspec {spec: ts.specs[1].Index, duration: 3, fund: sdk.NewCoins( sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), math.NewInt(90+minIprpcCost.Amount.Int64())), sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, math.NewInt(30)), )}, // 90ulava + 30uibc, 3 months, mockspec2 {spec: ts.specs[0].Index, duration: 3, fund: sdk.NewCoins( sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), math.NewInt(minIprpcCost.Amount.Int64())), sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, math.NewInt(130)), )}, // 130uibc, 3 months, mockspec {spec: ts.specs[1].Index, duration: 12, fund: sdk.NewCoins( sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), math.NewInt(10+minIprpcCost.Amount.Int64())), sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, math.NewInt(120)), )}, // 10ulava + 120uibc, 12 months, mockspec2 }
Line range hint
98-98: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withtrue, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(true) // setup funds IPRPC for mock2 spec
Line range hint
148-148: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withtrue, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(true) // setup funds IPRPC for mock2 spec
Line range hint
181-181: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withtrue, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(true) // setup funds IPRPC for mock2 spec for 1 month and advances a month
Line range hint
219-222: Improve readability by aligning the comments with the corresponding expected results.Align comments with the corresponding expected results for better readability.
expectedResults := []rewardstypes.IprpcReward{ { Id: 1, SpecFunds: []rewardstypes.Specfund{ {Spec: ts.specs[1].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, sdk.NewInt(500)), sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(1000)))}, }, // first month: mock2 - 500uibc + 3000ulava, mockspec - 100000ulava }, { Id: 2, SpecFunds: []rewardstypes.Specfund{ {Spec: ts.specs[0].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(100000)))}, {Spec: ts.specs[1].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(2000)))}, }, // second + third month: mock2 - 2000ulava, mockspec - 100000ulava }, { Id: 3, SpecFunds: []rewardstypes.Specfund{ {Spec: ts.specs[0].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(100000)))}, {Spec: ts.specs[1].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(2000)))}, }, }, { Id: 4, SpecFunds: []rewardstypes.Specfund{ {Spec: ts.specs[0].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(100000)))}, {Spec: ts.specs[1].Index, Fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ts.BondDenom(), sdk.NewInt(2000)))}, }, }, }
Line range hint
352-352: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withfalse, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(false) // setup without funding IPRPC
Line range hint
407-407: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withfalse, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(false) // setup without funding IPRPC
Line range hint
494-494: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withfalse, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(false) // setup without funding IPRPC
Line range hint
523-523: Clarify the test case names.The test case names could be more descriptive to clearly indicate the scenario being tested.
testCases := []struct { name string creator string fund sdk.Coins success bool }{ { name: "Happy flow - creator with enough funds and above min iprpc cost", creator: consumer, fund: sdk.NewCoins(minIprpcCost.AddAmount(sdk.NewInt(10))), success: true, }, { name: "Insufficient fund - below min iprpc cost", creator: consumer, fund: sdk.NewCoins(minIprpcCost.SubAmount(sdk.NewInt(10))), success: false, }, { name: "Insufficient fund - other denom above min iprpc cost", creator: consumer, fund: sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ibcDenom, minIprpcCost.Amount.AddRaw(10))), success: false, }, { name: "Insufficient balance for fund", creator: poorConsumer, fund: sdk.NewCoins(minIprpcCost.AddAmount(sdk.NewInt(10))), success: false, }, }
Line range hint
576-576: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withtrue, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(true) // setup creates consumers and providers and funds IPRPC pool for mock2 spec
Line range hint
581-581: Add comment to explain the modes.The modes for the test are defined as constants, but it is not clear what they mean. Adding a comment can help explain the modes.
const ( SUB_OWNERS = 0 DEVELOPERS_ADMIN_PROJECT = 1 DEVELOPERS_REGULAR_PROJECT = 2 ) // Modes for testing different consumer types
Line range hint
698-698: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withfalse, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(false) // creates consumers and providers staked on two stakes
Line range hint
773-773: Add comment to explain the setup for IPRPC tests.The setup function
setupForIprpcTestsis called withtrue, but it is not clear what the parameter means. Adding a comment can help explain the setup.ts.setupForIprpcTests(true) // create a consumer and buys subscription + funds iprpcx/rewards/keeper/helpers_test.go (1)
234-267: Add comments to improve readability.Consider adding comments to explain each step of the
SendIprpcOverIbcTransferPacketfunction to improve readability and maintainability.func (ts *tester) SendIprpcOverIbcTransferPacket(sender sdk.AccAddress, amount sdk.Coin, duration uint64) { // get the sender's and PendingIprpcPool before sending the packet senderBalanceBefore := ts.Keepers.BankKeeper.GetBalance(ts.Ctx, sender, amount.Denom) pendingIprpcPoolBalanceBefore := ts.Keepers.Rewards.TotalPoolTokens(ts.Ctx, rewardstypes.PendingIprpcPoolName) // create packet data memo, err := rewardstypes.CreateIprpcMemo(sender.String(), mockSpec, duration) require.NoError(ts.T, err) data := transfertypes.NewFungibleTokenPacketData(amount.Denom, amount.Amount.String(), sender.String(), "dummy", memo) marshelledData, err := transfertypes.ModuleCdc.MarshalJSON(&data) require.NoError(ts.T, err) // create packet packet := channeltypes.NewPacket(marshelledData, 0, testkeeper.MockSrcPort, testkeeper.MockSrcChannel, testkeeper.MockDestPort, testkeeper.MockDestChannel, clienttypes.ZeroHeight(), 1) // call OnRecvPacket ack := ts.IbcTransfer.OnRecvPacket(ts.Ctx, packet, sample.AccAddressObject()) if ack == nil || !ack.Success() { require.FailNow(ts.T, "ibc transfer failed") } // verify the sender's balance went down and the PendingIprpcPool balance went up senderBalanceAfter := ts.Keepers.BankKeeper.GetBalance(ts.Ctx, sender, amount.Denom) pendingIprpcPoolBalanceAfter := ts.Keepers.Rewards.TotalPoolTokens(ts.Ctx, rewardstypes.PendingIprpcPoolName) senderDiff := sdk.NewCoins(senderBalanceBefore.Sub(senderBalanceAfter)) require.True(ts.T, senderDiff.IsEqual(sdk.NewCoins(amount))) // pending pool gets the funds after going through the IBC channel -> check balance with ibc denom (subtracting leftovers) pendingIprpcPoolDiff := pendingIprpcPoolBalanceAfter.Sub(pendingIprpcPoolBalanceBefore...) leftoversAmount := amount.Amount.ModRaw(int64(duration)) ibcTokens := transfertypes.GetTransferCoin(packet.DestinationPort, packet.DestinationChannel, amount.Denom, amount.Amount) expectedIbcSenderDiff := sdk.NewCoins(sdk.NewCoin(ibcTokens.Denom, ibcTokens.Amount.Sub(leftoversAmount))) require.True(ts.T, expectedIbcSenderDiff.IsEqual(pendingIprpcPoolDiff)) }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
x/rewards/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/rewards/types/iprpc.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/rewards/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/rewards/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/rewards/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.gox/rewards/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (41)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/iprpc.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/params.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/query.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- scripts/test/cli_test.sh (1 hunks)
- testutil/common/tester.go (6 hunks)
- testutil/keeper/keepers_init.go (7 hunks)
- testutil/keeper/mock_keepers.go (2 hunks)
- utils/maps/maps.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/README.md (7 hunks)
- x/rewards/client/cli/query.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/client/cli/query_pending_ibc_iprpc_funds.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/client/cli/tx.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/client/cli/tx_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/client/cli/tx_submit_ibc_iprpc_proposal.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query_pending_ibc_iprpc_funds.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/helpers_test.go (4 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/iprpc.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/iprpc_reward.go (4 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/iprpc_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go (6 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/migrations.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/msg_server_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/msg_server_fund_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/params.go (3 hunks)
- x/rewards/keeper/pool_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/message_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/message_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/rewards/types/params.go (8 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
x/rewards/README.md
[duplication] ~20-~20: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...rds Pool](#providers-rewards-pool) * IPRPC * IPRPC over IBC * [Parameter...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[style] ~128-~128: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...m the beginning of the upcoming month. In order to fund the IPRPC pool, the user's funds m...(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)
[style] ~149-~149: Consider using a different introductory phrase to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ed from the monthly minimum IPRPC cost. Because of that, all IPRPC over IBC requests are consid...(BECAUSE_OF_THAT)
[uncategorized] ~202-~202: It seems likely that a singular genitive (’s) apostrophe is missing.
Context: ...nParticipation is used to calculate the providers rewards participation fees. ### IbcIpr...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_APOSTROPHE_S_XS)
[grammar] ~264-~264: Possible agreement error. Did you mean “eligibles”?
Context: ...th. Happens when there are no providers eligible for IPRPC rewards in the current month ...(THERE_RE_MANY)
Additional comments not posted (118)
x/rewards/types/errors.go (1)
11-14: Error definitions are clear and consistent.The newly added error definitions are clear, follow the existing pattern, and are consistent with the module's error handling strategy.
utils/maps/maps.go (2)
21-26: FunctionGetIDBytesis correctly implemented.The function correctly converts a
uint64ID to its byte representation using big-endian encoding.
28-31: FunctionGetIDFromBytesis correctly implemented.The function correctly converts a byte array to a
uint64ID using big-endian encoding.x/rewards/keeper/migrations.go (1)
21-25: Migration functionMigrateVersion2To3is correctly implemented.The function sets the
PendingIbcIprpcExpirationparameter to its default value. This is a straightforward migration and is implemented correctly.x/rewards/keeper/msg_server_fund_iprpc.go (1)
Line range hint
24-28:
Logging details are correctly implemented.The new logging details provide useful information about the funding event and are correctly implemented.
proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/iprpc.proto (2)
22-26: LGTM!The
IprpcMemomessage is well-defined and consistent with the overall design.
28-34: LGTM!The
PendingIbcIprpcFundmessage is well-defined and consistent with the overall design.x/rewards/keeper/msg_server_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (1)
12-31: LGTM!The
CoverIbcIprpcFundCostmethod is well-implemented with appropriate error handling and logging.x/rewards/client/cli/query.go (1)
34-34: LGTM!The command
CmdQueryPendingIbcIprpcFundsis appropriately added and consistent with the overall design.proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/genesis.proto (1)
23-23: Addition ofpending_ibc_iprpc_fundsfield looks good.The new field
pending_ibc_iprpc_fundsintegrates well with the existing genesis state structure.x/rewards/types/message_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (8)
1-7: Imports and package declaration look good.The necessary imports and package declaration are correctly included.
9-10: Constant declaration for message type looks good.The constant
TypeMsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostis correctly declared.
11-17: Constructor functionNewMsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostlooks good.The constructor function correctly initializes the
MsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCoststruct.
20-22: Route method implementation looks good.The
Routemethod returns the correct router key.
24-26: Type method implementation looks good.The
Typemethod returns the correct message type.
28-34: GetSigners method implementation looks good.The
GetSignersmethod correctly retrieves the signers for the message.
36-39: GetSignBytes method implementation looks good.The
GetSignBytesmethod correctly marshals and sorts the JSON representation of the message.
41-47: ValidateBasic method implementation looks good.The
ValidateBasicmethod correctly validates the creator address.proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/tx.proto (3)
15-15: Addition ofCoverIbcIprpcFundCostRPC method looks good.The new RPC method
CoverIbcIprpcFundCostis correctly added to the Msg service.
41-44: Message structure forMsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostlooks good.The message structure
MsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostis correctly defined with the necessary fields.
46-47: Message structure forMsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostResponselooks good.The message structure
MsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostResponseis correctly defined.proto/lavanet/lava/rewards/params.proto (2)
5-5: Import statement forduration.protolooks good.The import statement for
duration.protois correctly added.
43-48: Addition ofibc_iprpc_expirationfield looks good.The new field
ibc_iprpc_expirationintegrates well with the existing params structure.x/rewards/client/cli/query_pending_ibc_iprpc_funds.go (2)
14-45: LGTM! Ensure proper error handling.The code changes are approved. Ensure that error handling covers all edge cases.
14-14: Ensure proper handling of the filter argument.Verify that the
filterargument is correctly handled and validated in the rest of the codebase.x/rewards/client/cli/tx_cover_ibc_iprpc_fund_cost.go (2)
15-48: LGTM! Ensure proper error handling.The code changes are approved. Ensure that error handling covers all edge cases and that the
msgis properly validated.
15-15: Ensure proper handling of the index argument.Verify that the
indexargument is correctly handled and validated in the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
Proper handling of the
indexargument confirmed.The
CoverIbcIprpcFundCostfunction inx/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.gocorrectly handles and validates theindexargument. The function ensures theindexis used to fetch thePendingIbcIprpcFund, checks for its existence, and verifies it is not expired before proceeding with further operations.
- File:
x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go- Function:
CoverIbcIprpcFundCostScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the index argument in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the index argument in the codebase. Expect: Proper handling and validation. rg --type go $'index'Length of output: 84383
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract function implementations that utilize the `index` argument within the relevant files. # Extract functions from x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go that use the `index` argument ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func $_($_, index $_) $_ { $$$ }' x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.goLength of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract function implementations that utilize the `index` argument within the relevant files. # Search for function definitions that include the `index` argument in x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go rg --type go --pcre2 '\bindex\b' x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go # Extract full function implementations from x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func $_($_, index $_) $_ { $$$ }' x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.goLength of output: 1090
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `CoverIbcIprpcFundCost` function for review. # Extract the full implementation of the `CoverIbcIprpcFundCost` function from x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (k Keeper) CoverIbcIprpcFundCost(ctx sdk.Context, creator string, index uint64) (costCovered sdk.Coin, err error) { $$$ }' x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.goLength of output: 4233
x/rewards/genesis_test.go (2)
Line range hint
29-62:
LGTM! Ensure proper state verification.The test case is approved. Ensure that the state verification covers all edge cases and that the usage of
nullify.Fillis appropriate.
29-46: Ensure proper initialization of PendingIbcIprpcFunds.Verify that the initialization of
PendingIbcIprpcFundsis correct and covers all edge cases.Verification successful
Initialization and test coverage of PendingIbcIprpcFunds is comprehensive and correct.
The initialization of
PendingIbcIprpcFundsand its test coverage, including edge cases, are properly handled in the codebase.
- Instances of initialization in
genesis.goandgenesis_test.go.- Comprehensive test cases in
ibc_iprpc_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of PendingIbcIprpcFunds in the codebase. # Test: Search for the initialization of PendingIbcIprpcFunds in the codebase. Expect: Proper initialization and coverage of all edge cases. rg --type go $'PendingIbcIprpcFunds'Length of output: 16507
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and test coverage of PendingIbcIprpcFunds in the codebase. # Test: Search for test cases related to PendingIbcIprpcFunds in the codebase to ensure edge cases are covered. rg --type go 'PendingIbcIprpcFunds' -g '*.go' -g '*_test.go'Length of output: 16532
x/rewards/types/genesis_test.go (2)
34-47: LGTM! Ensure proper error handling.The test case is approved. Ensure that error handling covers all edge cases.
34-47: Ensure proper validation of PendingIbcIprpcFunds.Verify that the validation of
PendingIbcIprpcFundsis correct and covers all edge cases.x/rewards/genesis.go (2)
27-29: InitializePendingIbcIprpcFundsin Genesis.The addition of setting
PendingIbcIprpcFundsin the genesis state looks correct. This ensures that any pending IBC IPRPC funds are properly initialized when the chain starts.
42-42: ExportPendingIbcIprpcFundsin Genesis.The addition of exporting
PendingIbcIprpcFundsin the genesis state looks correct. This ensures that any pending IBC IPRPC funds are properly exported when the chain state is saved.x/rewards/keeper/params.go (3)
4-5: Importtimepackage.The import of the
timepackage is necessary for handling theIbcIprpcExpirationparameter.
19-19: IncludeIbcIprpcExpirationin Params.The addition of the
IbcIprpcExpirationparameter in theGetParamsfunction ensures that this new parameter is included when retrieving the module's parameters.
64-68: AddIbcIprpcExpirationgetter.The addition of the
IbcIprpcExpirationfunction ensures that the expiration parameter can be retrieved from the parameter store.x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query_pending_ibc_iprpc_funds.go (3)
1-1: Add package declaration.The package declaration is correct.
3-12: Add necessary imports.The imports are necessary for the functionality implemented in this file.
14-63: ImplementPendingIbcIprpcFundsgRPC query.The implementation of the
PendingIbcIprpcFundsquery method looks correct. It handles different filters (index, spec, creator) and constructs the response with the calculated costs for each pending IBC IPRPC fund. Ensure that theGetPendingIbcIprpcFund,GetAllPendingIbcIprpcFund, andCalcPendingIbcIprpcFundMinCostmethods are correctly implemented and tested.x/rewards/types/genesis.go (2)
20-27: AddPendingIbcIprpcFundsto Default Genesis State.The addition of
PendingIbcIprpcFundsin theDefaultGenesisfunction ensures that this field is initialized with an empty list by default.
72-76: ValidatePendingIbcIprpcFundsin Genesis State.The addition of validation for
PendingIbcIprpcFundsin theValidatefunction ensures that each pending IBC IPRPC fund is valid. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the genesis state.x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc.go (3)
39-41: LGTM!The function
IbcIprpcReceiverAddresscorrectly returns the module address for the IPRPC receiver.
58-61: LGTM!The method
IsEqualcorrectly compares twoPendingIbcIprpcFundinstances.
67-69: LGTM!The method
IsValidcorrectly validates aPendingIbcIprpcFundinstance.x/rewards/keeper/iprpc_reward.go (3)
Line range hint
46-50:
LGTM!The function
GetIprpcRewardcorrectly retrieves an IPRPC reward by its ID.
57-57: LGTM!The function
RemoveIprpcRewardcorrectly removes an IPRPC reward by its ID.
Line range hint
59-72:
LGTM!The function
GetAllIprpcRewardcorrectly retrieves all IPRPC rewards.x/rewards/types/ibc_iprpc_test.go (4)
14-32: LGTM!The test function
TestIprpcMemoIsEqualcorrectly tests theIsEqualmethod ofIprpcMemoand covers various scenarios.
35-57: LGTM!The test function
TestPendingIbcIprpcFundIsEqualcorrectly tests theIsEqualmethod ofPendingIbcIprpcFundand covers various scenarios.
60-76: LGTM!The test function
TestPendingIbcIprpcFundIsEmptycorrectly tests theIsEmptymethod ofPendingIbcIprpcFundand covers various scenarios.
78-97: LGTM!The test function
TestPendingIbcIprpcFundIsValidcorrectly tests theIsValidmethod ofPendingIbcIprpcFundand covers various scenarios.x/rewards/client/cli/tx.go (2)
45-46: LGTM!The
GetTxCmdfunction correctly includes new CLI commands for IPRPC over IBC functionalities.
48-48: LGTM!The
RunEfunction correctly processes the CLI command for setting IPRPC data proposals and covers various scenarios.x/rewards/types/params.go (3)
97-97: LGTM! Ensure validation logic is correct.The addition of the new parameter in the
ParamSetPairsfunction looks good.
131-133: LGTM! Ensure validation logic is correct.The addition of the new parameter validation looks good.
62-62: Ensure consistency in parameter order.Ensure that the parameter
ibcIprpcExpirationis consistently placed in the same order across all functions.Verification successful
The parameter
ibcIprpcExpirationis not inconsistently ordered in function signatures or calls.
- The parameter is used in struct field initialization and validation functions but is not directly part of any function signatures or calls in
params.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the parameter `ibcIprpcExpiration` is consistently placed in the same order across all functions. # Test: Search for the parameter usage. Expect: Consistent order in function signatures and calls. rg --type go 'ibcIprpcExpiration'Length of output: 434
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all function signatures and calls in params.go to verify the order of ibcIprpcExpiration. # Search for function signatures and calls in params.go rg --type go --pcre2 '(func\s+\w+\s*\([^)]*\)|\w+\s*\([^)]*\))' x/rewards/types/params.goLength of output: 3301
x/rewards/module.go (1)
138-143: LGTM! Ensure migration logic is correct.The addition of the new migration step from version 2 to version 3 looks good.
x/rewards/keeper/keeper.go (2)
116-117: Ensure correct handling of expired funds.The call to
RemoveExpiredPendingIbcIprpcFundsin theBeginBlockmethod looks good. Ensure that this function correctly handles expired funds.
160-175: LGTM! Ensure ICS4 wrapper functions are correctly implemented.The default implementations for the ICS4 wrapper functions look good.
x/rewards/keeper/iprpc.go (5)
24-40: Ensure minimum IPRPC cost validation is correct.The validation logic for the minimum IPRPC cost should be reviewed to ensure it correctly handles all edge cases. Specifically, the handling of
fundandminIprpcFundCostequality might need more context.Please ensure that the logic correctly handles cases where
fundis exactly equal tominIprpcFundCost. If this is intentional, consider adding a comment to explain why no funds are left to send to the IPRPC pool.
42-59: Check error handling for coin transfers.Ensure that the error handling for coin transfers is robust. Specifically, check that the
SendCoinsFromAccountToModuleandSendCoinsFromModuleToModulefunctions handle all potential errors.Please verify that the
SendCoinsFromAccountToModuleandSendCoinsFromModuleToModulefunctions handle all potential errors, including edge cases where the transfer might fail due to insufficient funds or other issues.
80-91: Ensure correct handling of sender types.The function handles different sender types (gov module or pending IPRPC pool). Ensure that the logic correctly distinguishes between these types and handles errors appropriately.
Please verify that the logic correctly distinguishes between the gov module and pending IPRPC pool as senders and handles any potential errors that might arise from this distinction.
Line range hint
92-107:
Ensure proper handling of IPRPC reward transfers.The function should ensure that all IPRPC reward transfers are correctly handled and logged.
Please verify that the function correctly handles all IPRPC reward transfers to the next month and logs any issues that might arise during this process.
Line range hint
108-190:
Ensure correct calculation and distribution of IPRPC rewards.The function should ensure that all IPRPC rewards are correctly calculated and distributed to providers. Pay special attention to the handling of
UsedRewardandleftovers.Please verify that the function correctly calculates and distributes IPRPC rewards to providers, and handles any potential errors during this process. Ensure that
UsedRewardandleftoversare correctly managed.scripts/test/cli_test.sh (2)
189-190: Add verification for pending IBC IPRPC funds query.Ensure that the query for pending IBC IPRPC funds is correctly tested and verified.
Please verify that the query for pending IBC IPRPC funds is correctly tested and returns the expected results.
191-195: Verify the new transaction commands for IPRPC funding over IBC.Ensure that the new transaction commands for IPRPC funding over IBC are correctly tested and verified.
Please verify that the new transaction commands for IPRPC funding over IBC (
fund-iprpcandsubmit-ibc-iprpc-tx) are correctly tested and return the expected results.x/rewards/client/cli/tx_submit_ibc_iprpc_proposal.go (5)
35-69: Ensure correct usage of command arguments.The command arguments should be clearly documented and validated.
Please verify that the command arguments are correctly documented and validated. Ensure that invalid arguments are handled gracefully.
81-106: Ensure proper error handling for client context retrieval.The error handling for client context retrieval should be robust.
Please verify that the error handling for client context retrieval is robust and handles all potential errors gracefully.
117-127: Verify the creation of transfer grant message.Ensure that the transfer grant message is correctly created and authorized.
Please verify that the transfer grant message is correctly created and authorized. Ensure that any potential errors are handled gracefully.
199-215: Ensure correct retrieval of gov module address.The function should ensure that the gov module address is correctly retrieved and any errors are handled gracefully.
Please verify that the function correctly retrieves the gov module address and handles any potential errors gracefully.
217-225: Ensure correct creation of IBC IPRPC memo.The function should ensure that the IBC IPRPC memo is correctly created and any errors are handled gracefully.
Please verify that the function correctly creates the IBC IPRPC memo and handles any potential errors gracefully.
testutil/keeper/mock_keepers.go (2)
167-190: Ensure correct initialization of mock IBC transfer keeper.The initialization of the mock IBC transfer keeper should be reviewed to ensure correctness.
Please verify that the mock IBC transfer keeper is correctly initialized with all necessary dependencies and handles any potential errors gracefully.
217-251: Ensure correct handling of received packets.The function
OnRecvPacketshould ensure that all received packets are correctly handled and any errors are properly logged.Please verify that the function correctly handles all received packets and logs any errors that might arise during the process.
x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (10)
191-196: LGTM!The function
SendPacketis straightforward and well-implemented.
235-237: LGTM!The function
GetAppVersionis straightforward and well-implemented.
174-181: LGTM!The function
OnAcknowledgementPacketis straightforward and well-implemented.
183-189: LGTM!The function
OnTimeoutPacketis straightforward and well-implemented.
39-46: LGTM!The function
OnChanOpenInitis straightforward and well-implemented.
48-58: LGTM!The function
OnChanOpenTryis straightforward and well-implemented.
60-67: LGTM!The function
OnChanOpenAckis straightforward and well-implemented.
69-71: LGTM!The function
OnChanOpenConfirmis straightforward and well-implemented.
73-75: LGTM!The function
OnChanCloseInitis straightforward and well-implemented.
77-79: LGTM!The function
OnChanCloseConfirmis straightforward and well-implemented.x/rewards/keeper/pool_test.go (2)
67-68: LGTM! The changes for the new IPRPC pools are correct.The checks for the new pool names (
types.IprpcPoolNameandtypes.PendingIprpcPoolName) are correctly added.
331-331: LGTM! The addition of theIbcIprpcExpirationparameter is correct.The
IbcIprpcExpirationparameter is correctly added to theParamsstruct.x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc_test.go (13)
22-140: LGTM! The test cases forOnRecvPacketare comprehensive and well-structured.The test cases cover multiple scenarios, including empty memo, non-JSON memo, JSON memo without "iprpc" tag, and valid/invalid JSON memos with "iprpc" tag.
145-160: LGTM! The helper functioncreateNPendingIbcIprpcFundsis correctly implemented.The function correctly creates an array of
PendingIbcIprpcFundobjects and sets them in the keeper.
162-171: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsGetis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
GetPendingIbcIprpcFundby verifying that the retrieved items match the expected items.
173-181: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsRemoveis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
RemovePendingIbcIprpcFundby verifying that the removed items cannot be found.
184-191: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsGetAllis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
GetAllPendingIbcIprpcFundby verifying that the retrieved items match the expected items.
194-221: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsRemoveExpiredis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
RemoveExpiredPendingIbcIprpcFundsandIsExpiredby verifying that the expired items are removed and cannot be found.
223-257: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsRemoveExpiredWithBeginBlockis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests that expired
PendingIbcIprpcFundsare removed withBeginBlockand their funds are sent to the community pool.
259-267: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundGetLatestis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
GetLatestPendingIbcIprpcFundby verifying that the retrieved item matches the expected item.
269-297: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundNewis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
NewPendingIbcIprpcFundby verifying the creation of newPendingIbcIprpcFundobjects with valid and invalid inputs.
299-308: LGTM! The test functionTestCalcPendingIbcIprpcFundMinCostis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
CalcPendingIbcIprpcFundMinCostby verifying that the calculated minimum cost matches the expected value.
310-316: LGTM! The test functionTestCalcPendingIbcIprpcFundExpirationis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests
CalcPendingIbcIprpcFundExpirationby verifying that the calculated expiration time matches the expected value.
318-379: LGTM! The test functionTestPendingIbcIprpcFundsQueryis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests the
pending-ibc-iprpc-fundsquery with various filters, verifying that the results match the expected values.
427-527: LGTM! The test functionTestCoverIbcIprpcFundCostis correctly implemented.The function correctly tests the
cover-ibc-iprpc-fund-costtransaction with various scenarios, verifying that the results match the expected values.testutil/keeper/keepers_init.go (4)
148-149: LGTM! The addition of the IBC transfer store key is correct.The
ibctransferStoreKeyis correctly added and mounted.
226-226: LGTM! The addition of the IBC transfer subspace is correct.The
ibctransferparamsSubspaceis correctly added to the params keeper.
255-255: LGTM! The retrieval of the IBC transfer subspace is correct.The
ibctransferparamsSubspaceis correctly retrieved from the params keeper.
261-261: LGTM! The initialization of the IBC transfer keeper is correct.The
IbcTransferkeeper is correctly initialized with the necessary dependencies.testutil/common/tester.go (4)
706-709: LGTM!The function
TxRewardsCoverIbcIprpcFundCostcorrectly creates and sends aMsgCoverIbcIprpcFundCostmessage.
981-984: LGTM!The function
QueryRewardsIprpcProviderRewardEstimationcorrectly creates and sends aQueryIprpcProviderRewardEstimationRequestmessage.
989-992: LGTM!The function
QueryRewardsIprpcSpecRewardcorrectly creates and sends aQueryIprpcSpecRewardRequestmessage.
998-1003: LGTM!The function
QueryRewardsPendingIbcIprpcFundscorrectly creates and sends aQueryPendingIbcIprpcFundsRequestmessage.x/rewards/keeper/helpers_test.go (1)
148-150: Consider using different addresses for sender and receiver.To enhance test realism, use different addresses for the sender and receiver in
createIbcTransferPacketData.- return transfertypes.NewFungibleTokenPacketData(ts.TokenDenom(), "100000", sample.AccAddress(), sample.AccAddress(), memo) + return transfertypes.NewFungibleTokenPacketData(ts.TokenDenom(), "100000", sample.AccAddress(), sample.AnotherAccAddress(), memo)x/rewards/keeper/ibc_iprpc.go (8)
160-165: LGTM!The function
SetPendingIbcIprpcFundis well-implemented.
167-176: LGTM!The function
GetPendingIbcIprpcFundis well-implemented.
178-182: LGTM!The function
RemovePendingIbcIprpcFundis well-implemented.
184-198: LGTM!The function
GetAllPendingIbcIprpcFundis well-implemented.
200-230: LGTM!The function
RemoveExpiredPendingIbcIprpcFundsis well-implemented.
232-246: LGTM!The function
GetLatestPendingIbcIprpcFundis well-implemented.
318-320: LGTM!The function
SendIbcTokensToPendingIprpcPoolis well-implemented.
322-324: LGTM!The function
FundCommunityPoolFromIbcIprpcReceiveris well-implemented.x/rewards/README.md (3)
204-207: LGTM!The
IbcIprpcExpirationsection is well-written.
220-221: LGTM!The
Queriessection is well-written.
234-234: LGTM!The
Transactionssection is well-written.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/rewards/ibc_middleware.go
In this PR, I made the rewards module act as an IBC middleware.
ibc-transferpackets are analyzed and get their memo field checked. If the memo is valid, a placeholder function for making IPRPC fund requests is called.The implementation of setting the fund requests will be in one of the the next parts of the IBC over IPRPC PRs.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores