Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Decide on project layout and package manager #5

Closed
nebula-aac opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Closed

Decide on project layout and package manager #5

nebula-aac opened this issue Aug 21, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Assignees
Labels
issue/design required Design specification needed kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature

Comments

@nebula-aac
Copy link
Contributor

nebula-aac commented Aug 21, 2023

UPDATE - There is a need to use some form of monorepo package manager, and while yarn is great in what it does, we have a lot of manual building being done. I want to revisit this to use either Turborepo, NX/Lerna, NX/rspack or others that I may not know immediately.

Current Behavior:
I would like to to decide on a project layout close to a monorepo or not.

One such design system layout we can follow is from

https://github.com/vercel/turbo/tree/main/examples/design-system

For the package manager, we can opt to use npm or pnpm.


Contributor Guide

@nebula-aac nebula-aac added the kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature label Aug 21, 2023
@leecalcote leecalcote added the issue/design required Design specification needed label Aug 23, 2023
@nebula-aac nebula-aac self-assigned this Sep 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue/design required Design specification needed kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants