Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create bf:PaginationFoliation as a subclass of bf:Extent #32

Open
sfolsom opened this issue Jun 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Create bf:PaginationFoliation as a subclass of bf:Extent #32

sfolsom opened this issue Jun 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review.

Comments

@sfolsom
Copy link

sfolsom commented Jun 26, 2018

Justification: The Sample Data section in https://github.com/LD4P/arm/blob/master/modeling_recommendations/pagination_foliation.md provides numerous pagination and foliation examples that provide fuller details of the extent, which currently cannot be accommodated fully by bf:extent/Extent, bf:unit/Unit, bf:count. The pagination and foliation requires understanding the sequence of various counts of pages, foliation, etc., and while one option is to turn each count into a bf:Unit, there is currently no way to order the various bf:Units and unlikely that it would be sustainable to maintain these a separate resources.

If not using separate bf:Unit resources to capture information (and rather than introducing a new datatype property for pagination and foliation), creating :PaginationFoliation as a subclass of bf:Extent allows the property query path to remain the same as the more general bf:Extent pattern, while still saying this particular extent is speaking specifically to the pagination and foliation of a bibliographic resource.

[This recommendation was made on behalf of the LD4P Art & Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension (https://github.com/LD4P/arm).]

@raydAtLC raydAtLC added semantic changes to rdfs:domain, rdfs:range, owl changes, etc. under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review. labels Aug 9, 2018
@kefo
Copy link
Member

kefo commented Jun 24, 2021

The presence of this class in ARM has made this status of this request unclear.

https://github.com/Art-and-Rare-Materials-BF-Ext/arm/blob/main/v1.0/ontology/arm_1_0.rdf

@jak473
Copy link

jak473 commented Jun 24, 2021

We'd deprecate arm:PaginationFoliation if created in BF

@jodiw01 jodiw01 removed the semantic changes to rdfs:domain, rdfs:range, owl changes, etc. label Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
under review Work begins on issue; incl. questions, consultations, or BFC review.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants